WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
18694
[CAIRO] Problem with rotation in a given matrix in SVG
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18694
Summary
[CAIRO] Problem with rotation in a given matrix in SVG
Dirk Schulze
Reported
2008-04-23 02:24:16 PDT
There is a problem with rotation of objects, if you use matrix() instead of rotate(). I opened the bug just to be sure not to forget anything. You can fix the problem for svg with: AffineTransform::AffineTransform(double a, double b, double c, double d, double tx, double ty) { cairo_matrix_init(&m_transform, a, b, c, d, tx, ty); } Is there anything else to do? Perhaps setB(), b() and setC(), c() ? In cairo a matrix is initialised with: cairo_matrix_init(cairo_matrix_t *matrix, xx, yx, xy, yy, x0, y0); So setB(), b() and setC() and c() could be wrong initialised.
Attachments
SVGCairoRotation
(1.21 KB, patch)
2008-04-23 02:47 PDT
,
Dirk Schulze
eric
: review-
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
SVGCairoRotation
(1.63 KB, patch)
2008-06-13 15:13 PDT
,
Dirk Schulze
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
SVGCairoRotation
(2.11 KB, patch)
2008-06-13 23:55 PDT
,
Dirk Schulze
eric
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
LayoutTest
(461 bytes, image/svg+xml)
2008-06-14 07:00 PDT
,
Dirk Schulze
eric
: review+
Details
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Dirk Schulze
Comment 1
2008-04-23 02:47:29 PDT
Created
attachment 20768
[details]
SVGCairoRotation see comment above
Dirk Schulze
Comment 2
2008-04-24 12:53:04 PDT
The values are given correctly to AffineTransform (in SVG-specification): like matrix(a,b,c,d,tx,ty) If you transform an SVG-object with Cairo, b and c are interchanged. That means: matrix(a,c,b,d,tx,ty) is the same on cairo like the matrix above on SVG. Thats why the interchange of c and b in AffineTransform should be correct. But the SVG-object is displayed wrong with it. I searched in GraphicsContestCairo and found the method void GraphicsContext::concatCTM(const AffineTransform& transform) In this method "transform" is changed back to a cairo_matrix_t with reinterpret_cast. I asked in IRC and it COULD be that this transformation interchange b and c in the background while transforming "transform" to cairo_matrix_t. Perhaps, thats why cairo_matrix_init(&m_transform, a, c, b, d, tx, ty); doesn't work correctly. So you should use a other possibility to change the type to cairo_matrix_t or you use cairo_matrix_init(&m_transform, a, b, c, d, tx, ty);
Dirk Schulze
Comment 3
2008-04-27 23:08:06 PDT
(In reply to
comment #2
)
> I searched in GraphicsContestCairo and found the method > void GraphicsContext::concatCTM(const AffineTransform& transform) > In this method "transform" is changed back to a cairo_matrix_t with > reinterpret_cast.
You can replace reinterpret_cast: const cairo_matrix_t* matrix = reinterpret_cast<const cairo_matrix_t*>(&transform); cairo_transform(cr, matrix); to cairo_matrix_t matrix = cairo_matrix_t(transform); cairo_transform(cr, &matrix); The code don't use reinterpret_cast but it doesn't solve the problem. You still have to change b to a and a to b in AffineTransform. I searched through the source-code of webkit with grep and SVG is the only one that use this method. I shoulnd't be a problem to fix it that way.
Dirk Schulze
Comment 4
2008-04-27 23:19:51 PDT
> have to change b to a and a to b in AffineTransform.
I mean b to c and c to b.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 5
2008-04-30 23:49:56 PDT
Comment on
attachment 20768
[details]
SVGCairoRotation This needs a layout test. Doesn't it already affect some layout test result? Also, your email is missing from your changelog. Otherwise the patch looks great!
David Jaša
Comment 6
2008-05-03 07:02:02 PDT
Maybe WK could use this test as layout test:
http://www.carto.net/papers/svg/samples/matrix.shtml
Dirk Schulze
Comment 7
2008-05-03 13:02:20 PDT
(In reply to
comment #6
)
> Maybe WK could use this test as layout test: >
http://www.carto.net/papers/svg/samples/matrix.shtml
>
But not a good test in this case, since WebKitGtk doesn't support the <!ENTITY ...> -element (or at least partial).
Dirk Schulze
Comment 8
2008-06-13 15:13:45 PDT
Created
attachment 21690
[details]
SVGCairoRotation I misunderstood the documentation of CGAffineTransform. The CGAffineTransform is the transpose of cairo_matrix. That means a is xx on cairo, [1,1] on CGAffineTransform b is yx on cairo, [1,2] on CGAffineTransform c is xy on cairo, [2,1] on CGAffineTransform d is yy on cairo, [2,2] on CGAffineTransform and so on. That means the handover of the values have to be AffineTransform(a, b, c, d, e, f).
Dirk Schulze
Comment 9
2008-06-13 23:55:47 PDT
Created
attachment 21694
[details]
SVGCairoRotation forgot b(), setB() and c(), setC()
Dirk Schulze
Comment 10
2008-06-14 07:00:43 PDT
Created
attachment 21700
[details]
LayoutTest I created a test because I haven't found a test case for rotation with a matrix in layouttests. This one draws two boxes. The red box is rotated with the attribute 'rotate' and the green box with a matrix (both with the same angle). You should only see the green box.
Dirk Schulze
Comment 11
2008-06-19 11:17:55 PDT
The patch solves problems with transformed images on
http://paulbakaus.com/lab/js/coverflow/
too.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 12
2008-06-26 12:01:08 PDT
Comment on
attachment 21694
[details]
SVGCairoRotation The patch looks fine. Of course Dirk informed me over IRC that GTK doesn't actually have DumpRenderTree yet... so run-webkit-tests (And thus layout tests) don't work. :(
Mark Rowe (bdash)
Comment 13
2008-07-26 23:02:48 PDT
Landed in
r35399
.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 14
2008-08-01 12:15:16 PDT
Comment on
attachment 21700
[details]
LayoutTest this test could be much better. If you want to test that certain rotations work as expected, you should put a second red box behind the green one, the green one would only ever cover all of the red if your bug was fixed (i.e. the rotations for those particular matrices were calculated correctly.)
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 15
2008-08-01 12:26:57 PDT
Comment on
attachment 21700
[details]
LayoutTest My bad. Looks fine. Even better would be to just show the green box at 0,0 unrotated (no text below it). That would require these to be in a <g> with another rotate(-10) applied.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug