WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED DUPLICATE of
bug 10085
14650
Screenshots sidebar misplaced on McAfee site causing layout issues
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14650
Summary
Screenshots sidebar misplaced on McAfee site causing layout issues
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Reported
2007-07-17 13:59:37 PDT
* SUMMARY On ToT WebKit and Opera, the McAfee page has too much whitespace between the left navigation column and the content of the page because the screenshots sidebar is misplaced (versus Firefox 2.0.0.4). * STEPS TO REPRODUCE 1. Launch Safari/WebKit. 2. Go to URL:
http://us.mcafee.com/root/package.asp?pkgid=276&affid=101
* EXPECTED RESULTS The screenshots sidebar should be in the far right column. * ACTUAL RESULTS The screenshots sidebar is at the bottom left of the page. * REGRESSION Tested with a local debug build of WebKit
r24369
with Safari 3.0 (522.12) on Mac OS X 10.4.10 (8R218). Not tested with Safari 2.0.4 yet, so unknown if this is a regression. * NOTES Firefox 2.0.0.4 renders correctly. Opera 9.21 shows the same bug as ToT WebKit.
Attachments
Webarchive of page
(160.93 KB, application/x-webarchive)
2007-07-17 14:00 PDT
,
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
no flags
Details
Partial reduction
(5.81 KB, application/x-gzip)
2007-11-15 10:56 PST
,
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
no flags
Details
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 1
2007-07-17 14:00:42 PDT
Created
attachment 15554
[details]
Webarchive of page Webarchive of page. A "web page, complete" from Firefox did not reproduce the issue correctly.
David Storey
Comment 2
2007-07-17 14:18:12 PDT
We've had a few similar bug reports on McAfee's site in Opera. I'll see if I can dig up a contact.
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 3
2007-11-15 10:56:04 PST
Created
attachment 17298
[details]
Partial reduction The tar ball contains an html page and four gif images. The html page is the output from automated child node and stylesheet rule reductions with a few tweaks by me to add id attributes and background colors. (The first stylesheet in the original page loaded over 1400 rules!) Haven't tried to reduce it further by hand.
mitz
Comment 4
2007-11-15 12:04:19 PST
I see the layout problem in the webarchive (
attachment 15554
[details]
) but not in the live site. Are you still seeing it in the site? I started working off the reduction and I think it's the "right float expands containing div in Firefox" issue which seems to be fixed in Firefox 3 trunk.
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 5
2007-11-15 13:04:58 PST
(In reply to
comment #4
)
> I see the layout problem in the webarchive (
attachment 15554
[details]
[edit]) but not in the > live site. Are you still seeing it in the site?
No, I don't see this on the live site.
> I started working off the reduction and I think it's the "right float expands > containing div in Firefox" issue which seems to be fixed in Firefox 3 trunk.
Resolve this bug as INVALID?
mitz
Comment 6
2007-11-15 13:19:30 PST
(In reply to
comment #5
)
> (In reply to
comment #4
) > > I see the layout problem in the webarchive (
attachment 15554
[details]
[edit] [edit]) but not in the > > live site. Are you still seeing it in the site? > > No, I don't see this on the live site.
Meaning it's changed? Looking at the date the bug was opened that's actually likely.
> > I started working off the reduction and I think it's the "right float expands > > containing div in Firefox" issue which seems to be fixed in Firefox 3 trunk. > > Resolve this bug as INVALID?
Nope, as a duplicate of
bug 10085
:-) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of
10085
***
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 7
2007-11-15 13:27:02 PST
(In reply to
comment #6
)
> (In reply to
comment #5
) > > (In reply to
comment #4
) > > > I see the layout problem in the webarchive (
attachment 15554
[details]
[edit] [edit] [edit]) but not in the > > > live site. Are you still seeing it in the site? > > No, I don't see this on the live site. > Meaning it's changed? Looking at the date the bug was opened that's actually > likely.
Yes.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug