Bug 13142 – REGRESSION (r19559): Java applet crash

• Status: RESOLVED
• Resolution: FIXED
• Component: JavaScriptCore

[José Luís Andrade]

In menu site:

Downloads > IRS

It results Webkit crash. Safari e Firefox not crash.

[José Luís Andrade]

Created attachment 13735 [details]
Console Log

[José Luís Andrade]

Created attachment 13736 [details]
Safari Crash Log

[Matt Lilek]

Confirmed with a local build of r20355.

Console spew!
/Users/matt/Code/WebKit/JavaScriptCore/bindings/jni/jni_instance.cpp:343 -- JObjectWrapper:  new global ref 0x7c0cb5c for 0x7c0d730
/Users/matt/Code/WebKit/JavaScriptCore/bindings/jni/jni_instance.cpp:343 -- JObjectWrapper:  new global ref 0x7c0cb60 for 0x7c0d74c
[snip about a dozen of the same lines]
/Users/matt/Code/WebKit/JavaScriptCore/bindings/jni/jni_instance.cpp:128 -- invokeMethod:  call checkVersion ()Z on 0x7c12c9c
# [ timer expired, abort... ]

[Mark Rowe (bdash)]

<rdar://problem/5080340>

[David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)]

*** Bug 13182 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[David Carson]

Created attachment 13812 [details]
Reduced Test case

Reduced test case. HTML file, compiled java file that returns a boolean (true) and the source code for the java file. Unzip and and load.

[David Carson]

Took a look at it and resolving the JVM and the JNI calls seem quite reasonable.  The crash happens in code where source is not available, MethodSwizzle onwards.

#0	0x9b58e0cd in JVM_MonitorWait
#1	0x9b70ca05 in JNI_GetDefaultJavaVMInitArgs_Impl
#2	0x172290c1 in ConvertJavaToJValue
#3	0x1722e99d in MethodSwizzle
#4	0x00520a0d in KJS::Bindings::dispatchJNICall at jni_objc.mm:56
#5	0x00516fe7 in KJS::Bindings::JavaInstance::invokeMethod at jni_instance.cpp:156
#6	0x005177ff in KJS::RuntimeMethod::callAsFunction at runtime_method.cpp:89
#7	0x004fb216 in KJS::JSObject::call at object.cpp:97
#8	0x004f2164 in KJS::FunctionCallDotNode::evaluate at nodes.cpp:781
#9	0x004eb691 in KJS::AssignExprNode::evaluate at nodes.cpp:1536

[David Carson]

Checking nightly builds, r19524 does not crash, r19562 does crash

[David Carson]

It seems that JNIType enum defined in jni_instance.h is tightly bound with the Java implementation on Mac. Adding a type for arrays, ie array_type broke the JVM on Mac as the types were then out by one. The enum is used by jni_obj.mm to indicate the return type.

[David Carson]

Created attachment 13813 [details]
Patch

[David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)]

(In reply to comment #8)
> Checking nightly builds, r19524 does not crash, r19562 does crash

This must have regressed with r19559 which fixed Bug 12636.

[David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)]

Do the results of the WebCore/manual-tests/liveconnect-applet-array-parameters.html test change after this patch?  The "Send object array" test would always throw an exception for me:

/path/to/WebKit/JavaScriptCore/bindings/jni/jni_instance.cpp:128 -- invokeMethod:  call objectFunction ([Ljava/applet/Applet;)V on 0xda0e6b0
/path/to/WebKit/JavaScriptCore/bindings/jni/jni_instance.cpp:139 -- invokeMethod:  arg[0] = 0.1,0.1,0.2
objectArray called
java.security.PrivilegedActionException: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
        at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
        at sun.plugin.liveconnect.SecureInvocation$2.run(SecureInvocation.java:212)
        at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
        at sun.plugin.liveconnect.SecureInvocation.CallMethod(SecureInvocation.java:191)
        at sun.plugin.liveconnect.SecureInvocation.access$300(SecureInvocation.java:51)
        at sun.plugin.liveconnect.SecureInvocation$CallMethodThread.run(SecureInvocation.java:122)
Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
        at sun.plugin.javascript.invoke.JSInvoke.invoke(JSInvoke.java:19)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
        at sun.plugin.javascript.JSClassLoader.invoke(JSClassLoader.java:44)
        at sun.plugin.liveconnect.PrivilegedCallMethodAction.run(SecureInvocation.java:580)
        ... 6 more
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
        at ArrayParameterTestApplet.objectFunction(ArrayParameterTestApplet.java:86)
        ... 17 more
(event handler):java.security.PrivilegedActionException: java.security.PrivilegedActionException: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException

[David Carson]

(In reply to comment #12)
> Do the results of the
> WebCore/manual-tests/liveconnect-applet-array-parameters.html test change after
> this patch?  The "Send object array" test would always throw an exception for
> me:

That is a Java exception generated in the JVM and it was happening before. Maybe I should have been clearer in my comment in the test case, that says that it will fail.

[David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)]

(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > Do the results of the
> > WebCore/manual-tests/liveconnect-applet-array-parameters.html test change after
> > this patch?  The "Send object array" test would always throw an exception for
> > me:
> 
> That is a Java exception generated in the JVM and it was happening before.
> Maybe I should have been clearer in my comment in the test case, that says that
> it will fail.

Does that only fail on Apple's JVM?  For example, if the manual test were run on Windows, would it work?  (This means that a bug needs to be filed with Apple's internal bug system to resolve the issue.)

BTW, thanks for researching and providing a patch for this bug!

[David Carson]

> > That is a Java exception generated in the JVM and it was happening before.
> > Maybe I should have been clearer in my comment in the test case, that says that
> > it will fail.
> 
> Does that only fail on Apple's JVM?  For example, if the manual test were run
> on Windows, would it work?  (This means that a bug needs to be filed with
> Apple's internal bug system to resolve the issue.)

Tested on FF in Windows, and it also fails there - as expected. Though I don't see the exception from the JVM. I don't see anything.

[Darin Adler]

Comment on attachment 13813 [details]
Patch

r=me

[David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)]

Committed by Anders in r 20502.

Tweaked changelog entry to add Radar bug number in r20505.