WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
12340
XPathEvaluator behavior does not match Firefox - name() and attribute nodes
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12340
Summary
XPathEvaluator behavior does not match Firefox - name() and attribute nodes
Jesse Costello-Good
Reported
2007-01-19 22:31:19 PST
// #2 // function name() does not work with attribute nodes var strXML = '<data><record id="-a-" a="v">???</record><record id="a-a">{abc}</record></data>'; var doc = (new DOMParser()).parseFromString(strXML, "text/xml"); var xpe = new XPathEvaluator(); var objResult = xpe.evaluate("//@*[name()='id']", doc, null, 0, null); var itm = null; var objNodes = []; while (itm = objResult.iterateNext()) objNodes.push(itm); assertEquals(2, objNodes.length); // Safari yields 0
Attachments
proposed fix
(7.68 KB, patch)
2007-01-27 12:37 PST
,
Alexey Proskuryakov
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
proposed fix
(7.60 KB, patch)
2007-01-28 04:55 PST
,
Alexey Proskuryakov
darin
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 1
2007-01-27 12:37:20 PST
Created
attachment 12715
[details]
proposed fix
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 2
2007-01-28 04:55:11 PST
Created
attachment 12723
[details]
proposed fix Changed the wording of comments in the test a bit - the way name() works with a document that didn't have namespace normalization applied to it may be actually correct (at least, I couldn't find any indication that XPathEvaluator is supposed to normalize the document itself).
Darin Adler
Comment 3
2007-01-28 18:19:53 PST
Comment on
attachment 12723
[details]
proposed fix r=me Should that be prefix.isEmpty() instead of prefix.isNull()? Is it possible to construct a test that would behave differently depending on which you used? In general, I recommend taking advantage of the null value as distinct from empty only when it's necessary, so if either would work the same I'd prefer isEmpty.
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 4
2007-01-29 10:16:42 PST
Committed revision 19226. (In reply to
comment #3
)
> Should that be prefix.isEmpty() instead of prefix.isNull()? Is it possible to > construct a test that would behave differently depending on which you used?
I don't know how to make such a test; changed to isEmpty().
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug