RESOLVED FIXED42562
layout tests from changeset 56661 were missed
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42562
Summary layout tests from changeset 56661 were missed
Robert Hogan
Reported 2010-07-19 07:13:22 PDT
These tests were omitted from changeset 56661 See also webkit.org/n/32196
Attachments
Patch (5.19 KB, patch)
2010-09-11 05:21 PDT, Robert Hogan
tonikitoo: review+
commit-queue: commit-queue-
Robert Hogan
Comment 1 2010-09-11 05:21:20 PDT
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 2 2010-10-13 12:26:47 PDT
Attachment 67297 [details] was posted by a committer and has review+, assigning to Robert Hogan for commit.
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 3 2010-11-25 11:25:30 PST
Comment on attachment 67297 [details] Patch Rejecting patch 67297 from commit-queue. Failed to run "['./WebKitTools/Scripts/webkit-patch', '--status-host=queues.webkit.org', '--bot-id=eseidel-cq-sl', 'build-and-test', '--no-clean', '--no-update', '--test', '--non-interactive']" exit_code: 2 Last 500 characters of output: /fast/forms ....... platform/mac/fast/loader ..... platform/mac/fast/objc ... platform/mac/fast/overflow . platform/mac/fast/text ............ platform/mac/fast/text/international .. platform/mac/plugins ........... platform/mac/scrollbars . plugins .. plugins/application-plugin-plugins-disabled.html -> failed Exiting early after 1 failures. 18260 tests run. 393.52s total testing time 18259 test cases (99%) succeeded 1 test case (<1%) had incorrect layout 10 test cases (<1%) had stderr output Full output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/6379063
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 4 2010-12-14 01:33:18 PST
Looks like this patch isnt' quite right? I assume someone else already resolved these missing results though? Should this be closed?
Robert Hogan
Comment 5 2011-01-02 13:14:34 PST
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 6 2011-01-02 14:30:15 PST
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/74872 might have broken Leopard Intel Release (Tests), Leopard Intel Debug (Tests), SnowLeopard Intel Release (Tests), GTK Linux 32-bit Release, and GTK Linux 64-bit Debug The following tests are not passing: plugins/application-plugin-plugins-disabled.html
Robert Hogan
Comment 7 2011-01-02 14:35:45 PST
(In reply to comment #6) > http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/74872 might have broken Leopard Intel Release (Tests), Leopard Intel Debug (Tests), SnowLeopard Intel Release (Tests), GTK Linux 32-bit Release, and GTK Linux 64-bit Debug > The following tests are not passing: > plugins/application-plugin-plugins-disabled.html Fixed with http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/74876
Kent Tamura
Comment 8 2011-01-02 17:56:21 PST
Why application-plugin-plugins-disabled-expected.txt is placed in LayoutTests/plugin/, and it doesn't have the corresponding pixel result?
Robert Hogan
Comment 9 2011-01-03 05:06:45 PST
(In reply to comment #8) > Why application-plugin-plugins-disabled-expected.txt is placed in LayoutTests/plugin/, and it doesn't have the corresponding pixel result? I wasn't aware pixel results were mandatory. My setup would only allow me to generate a pixel result for qt or gtk - so not even sure they would be useful. All platforms for qt should have the same result as the one given in LayoutTests/plugins/ - bar minor metric differences.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 10 2011-01-03 11:14:09 PST
Chromium runs pixel tests always. The rest of the port should, but don't yet. :) We used to run pixel tests for the Apple Mac port on the bots, but haven't in years.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.