4 layout tests failed by r48861. fast/dom/prototype-inheritance-2.html -> failed fast/dom/prototype-inheritance.html -> failed fast/dom/Window/window-properties.html -> failed fast/js/global-constructors.html -> failed
Created attachment 40289 [details] Fix 4 layout test failures by r48861
Comment on attachment 40289 [details] Fix 4 layout test failures by r48861 Looks fine. Go ahead and commit. :)
The commit-queue can't handle tree fixes yet, so this has to be landed by hand.
(In reply to comment #2) > (From update of attachment 40289 [details]) > Looks fine. Go ahead and commit. :) Thanks! Landed as r48863.
Why is it ok for WebSocket to return undefined. This seems like it will give the impression that we support the feature.
(In reply to comment #5) > Why is it ok for WebSocket to return undefined. This seems like it will give > the impression that we support the feature. I believe a web developer checks the feature by checking it is undefined or not. If the feature is supported, it should be object (or function). If there any way to clear property (custom constructor) from DOMWindow at all in runtime, I'll do it.