If a tr is given a style which contains a display-declaration, the tr does not follow the style-declarations in the col-tags. example: <html><head></head><body> <table style="width:99%"><col style="width:13em" /><col style="width:auto" /> <tr><td>Test</td><td>Test</td></tr> <tr style="display:run-in"><td>Test</td><td>Test</td></tr> </table> </body></html> The second row in the table will show cells with the auto-widths (even when table-layout is set to fixed, and indepent of the type of width-setting) The bug was observed in google chrome with webkit 525.13 and in safari (also 525.13), not in firefox 3.0.1 or MSIE
Bug also shows in latest Safari (build 525.21)
And bug also shows in latest nightly build for windows (r36012). (Updated version # in bugreport) (Had to use acid3-test to tell the difference between standard-safari and webkit: safari scored 75/100, webkit 100/100 except that every 1 in abt 5 refreshes showed 98/100 or 96/100 (Test Namespace Test parent.notify("xhtml.3") sometimes remained visible, sometimes I could not tell the difference with 100/100)
Created attachment 23150 [details] testcase
Not a bug. If you set 'display' to something other than 'table-row', then *it's no longer a table row*. The CSS table fix-up algorithm then goes to work and does some fun things to the table's formatting structure. In other words, you start with this structure: table - table-column - table-column - table-row - table-cell - table-cell - table-row - table-cell - table-cell But after you set the second <tr> to be display:run-in, you instead get this structure: table - table-column - table-column - table-row - table-cell - table-cell - (anonymous) table-row - (anonymous) table-cell - run-in - (anonymous) table - (anonymous) table-row - table-cell - table-cell This is all expected behavior, so I'm marking this bug as invalid.