NEW 205914
[GTK] Overall page loading and rendering performance is slow
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205914
Summary [GTK] Overall page loading and rendering performance is slow
crvi
Reported 2020-01-08 03:23:11 PST
Just started using Gnome Web in VM. VM has 3G RAM. Page rendering is slow. Have opened < 10 tabs and the responsiveness is very slow. Firefox is way faster with approx 20 tabs in the same VM. Gnome Web Version is 3.34.1 Tasks: 195 total, 1 running, 194 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie %Cpu(s): 13.0 us, 1.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 84.0 id, 1.3 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st MiB Mem : 2925.1 total, 255.4 free, 2442.2 used, 227.6 buff/cache MiB Swap: 2046.0 total, 970.7 free, 1075.2 used. 304.8 avail Mem PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 59729 sid 20 0 82.7g 228704 51168 S 9.6 7.6 19:17.37 WebKitWebProces 1175 sid 20 0 2694184 218136 43060 S 7.3 7.3 53:53.99 gnome-shell 60307 sid 20 0 98.8g 256392 48340 S 4.0 8.6 12:40.08 WebKitWebProces 103379 sid 20 0 82.2g 119340 50364 S 3.0 4.0 1:06.29 WebKitWebProces 60849 sid 20 0 82.9g 439248 69124 S 1.0 14.7 2:04.73 WebKitWebProces 62323 sid 20 0 98.2g 204436 39560 S 1.0 6.8 2:52.21 WebKitWebProces 59946 sid 20 0 82.1g 59344 38916 S 0.7 2.0 1:15.46 WebKitWebProces 103779 sid 20 0 98.2g 276992 43092 S 0.7 9.2 0:45.38 WebKitWebProces 104591 sid 20 0 98.1g 238960 117348 S 0.7 8.0 0:17.23 WebKitWebProces 104691 sid 20 0 9156 3444 2984 R 0.7 0.1 0:00.04 top 1122 sid 9 -11 1674836 8304 6896 S 0.3 0.3 1:32.68 pulseaudio 59703 sid 20 0 81.9g 34616 17704 S 0.3 1.2 0:38.36 WebKitNetworkPr 60055 sid 20 0 98.1g 64552 40396 S 0.3 2.2 1:16.10 WebKitWebProces 1 root 20 0 166304 5256 4188 S 0.0 0.2 0:11.37 systemd
Attachments
crvi
Comment 1 2020-01-08 03:25:42 PST
Few lines towards the end of log in epiphany process terminal: ... ... Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 24739840/24739840/0, res+swap = 24432640/24432640/0 Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 52015104/52019200/4096, res+swap = 41168896/41168896/0 Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 239513600/239513600/0, res+swap = 229117952/229117952/0 Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 20922368/20922368/0, res+swap = 18612224/18612224/0 Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 182525952/182706176/180224, res+swap = 177901568/177901568/0 Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 383492096/383688704/196608, res+swap = 376414208/376414208/0 Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 70496256/70496256/0, res+swap = 59318272/59318272/0 Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 213094400/213159936/65536, res+swap = 211722240/211722240/0 Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 125853696/122195968/-3657728, res+swap = 115089408/115089408/0 Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 127406080/122343424/-5062656, res+swap = 116592640/116592640/0 Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 23744512/23740416/-4096, res+swap = 12881920/12881920/0 Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 8409088/8364032/-45056, res+swap = 7159808/7159808/0 Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 43253760/43245568/-8192, res+swap = 32464896/32464896/0 Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 52019200/52019200/0, res+swap = 41168896/41168896/0 Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 25407488/25460736/53248, res+swap = 25178112/25178112/0 Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 239550464/239534080/-16384, res+swap = 229154816/229154816/0 Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 21340160/21401600/61440, res+swap = 19120128/19120128/0 Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 187076608/186970112/-106496, res+swap = 182710272/182710272/0 Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 170065920/169127936/-937984, res+swap = 158986240/158986240/0 Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 118476800/114593792/-3883008, res+swap = 107429888/107429888/0 Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 345382912/345354240/-28672, res+swap = 338907136/338907136/0 Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 75374592/71749632/-3624960, res+swap = 64200704/64200704/0 Memory pressure relief: Total: res = 216031232/215363584/-667648, res+swap = 215109632/215109632/0
Jeff Fortin
Comment 2 2022-09-28 08:00:47 PDT
It is a well known problem that Epiphany is much slower than Firefox and Chromium, but I think you'll need to provide some specific examples of URLs and actions that exhibit the problem, otherwise this won't be actionable for the devs...
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.