That's the only color keyword that is defined in https://www.w3.org/TR/css-color-4/#named-colors but missing in the Web Inpector color dictionary.
Created attachment 383303 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 383303 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=383303&action=review r=me > Source/WebInspectorUI/UserInterface/Models/Color.js:745 > + "aqua": [0, 255, 255, 1], We're also missing `fuchsia`, which is one of the original HTML colors 🤦♂️: ``` "fuchsia": [255, 0, 255, 1], ``` Interestingly, both `aqua` and `fuchsia` have alternate names in CSS, respectively being `cyan` and `magenta`. This doesn't look to be an issue, other than that we'll instead always prefer `aqua` over `cyan` (same with `fuchsia` over `magenta`) when generating CSS color keyword strings simply because they're sorted alphabetically.
Created attachment 383489 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 383489 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 383489 Committed r252448: <https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/252448>
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
<rdar://problem/57178710>