WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
195602
Move IDB storage in private browsing mode to NetworkProcess
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195602
Summary
Move IDB storage in private browsing mode to NetworkProcess
youenn fablet
Reported
2019-03-11 21:12:30 PDT
Move IDB storage in private browsing mode to NetworkProcess
Attachments
Patch
(6.74 KB, patch)
2019-03-11 21:15 PDT
,
youenn fablet
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(6.84 KB, patch)
2019-03-12 11:32 PDT
,
youenn fablet
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Rebasing
(6.81 KB, patch)
2019-03-14 13:46 PDT
,
youenn fablet
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Removing unneeded member field
(7.41 KB, patch)
2019-03-14 15:08 PDT
,
youenn fablet
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(3)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
youenn fablet
Comment 1
2019-03-11 21:15:47 PDT
Created
attachment 364347
[details]
Patch
youenn fablet
Comment 2
2019-03-12 11:32:42 PDT
Created
attachment 364417
[details]
Patch
youenn fablet
Comment 3
2019-03-14 13:46:19 PDT
Created
attachment 364681
[details]
Rebasing
Alex Christensen
Comment 4
2019-03-14 14:36:59 PDT
Comment on
attachment 364681
[details]
Rebasing View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=364681&action=review
Is it really this simple?
> Source/WebKit/WebProcess/Databases/WebDatabaseProvider.cpp:-73 > - auto result = m_idbEphemeralConnectionMap.add(sessionID.sessionID(), nullptr);
m_idbEphemeralConnectionMap is now unused.
Brady Eidson
Comment 5
2019-03-14 14:46:41 PDT
(In reply to Alex Christensen from
comment #4
)
> Comment on
attachment 364681
[details]
> Rebasing > > View in context: >
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=364681&action=review
> > Is it really this simple?
Yup. There's two IDBServers - In-process and remote. There's two IDBBackingStores - SQLite and in-memory All we had to do was change the mix and match. 👍
youenn fablet
Comment 6
2019-03-14 15:08:52 PDT
Created
attachment 364695
[details]
Removing unneeded member field
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 7
2019-03-14 16:08:33 PDT
Comment on
attachment 364695
[details]
Removing unneeded member field Clearing flags on attachment: 364695 Committed
r242975
: <
https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/242975
>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 8
2019-03-14 16:08:34 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 9
2019-03-14 16:09:20 PDT
<
rdar://problem/48906494
>
Truitt Savell
Comment 10
2019-03-15 09:44:51 PDT
The changes in
https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/242975/webkit
appears to have broken: imported/w3c/IndexedDB-private-browsing/idbobjectstore_createIndex6-event_order.html History:
https://webkit-test-results.webkit.org/dashboards/flakiness_dashboard.html#showAllRuns=true&tests=imported%2Fw3c%2FIndexedDB-private-browsing%2Fidbobjectstore_createIndex6-event_order.html
I was able to reproduce this locally using command: run-webkit-tests imported/w3c/IndexedDB-private-browsing/idbobjectstore_createIndex6-event_order.html --iterations 500 -f The test fails often when run on 242975 and not at all on 242974.
youenn fablet
Comment 11
2019-03-15 11:33:39 PDT
(In reply to Truitt Savell from
comment #10
)
> The changes in
https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/242975/webkit
> > appears to have broken: > imported/w3c/IndexedDB-private-browsing/idbobjectstore_createIndex6- > event_order.html > > History: >
https://webkit-test-results.webkit.org/dashboards/flakiness_dashboard
. > html#showAllRuns=true&tests=imported%2Fw3c%2FIndexedDB-private- > browsing%2Fidbobjectstore_createIndex6-event_order.html > > I was able to reproduce this locally using command: > run-webkit-tests > imported/w3c/IndexedDB-private-browsing/idbobjectstore_createIndex6- > event_order.html --iterations 500 -f > > The test fails often when run on 242975 and not at all on 242974.
Looking at the dashboard, the corresponding non private browsing is also flaky with the same kind of failure. Given we updated private IDB to be closer to regular IDB, it might be that an existing flakiness is now also happening with private IDB.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug