Bug 97955

Summary: Fix compilation of V8DependentRetained and JSDependentRetained.
Product: WebKit Reporter: Elliott Sprehn <esprehn>
Component: New BugsAssignee: Elliott Sprehn <esprehn>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: Normal CC: abarth, haraken, japhet, webkit.review.bot
Priority: P2    
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Bug Depends on:    
Bug Blocks: 93661    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch none

Elliott Sprehn
Reported 2012-09-28 17:31:55 PDT
Fix compilation of V8DependentRetained and JSDependentRetained.
Attachments
Patch (5.00 KB, patch)
2012-09-28 17:34 PDT, Elliott Sprehn
no flags
Elliott Sprehn
Comment 1 2012-09-28 17:34:01 PDT
Kentaro Hara
Comment 2 2012-09-28 17:52:08 PDT
Comment on attachment 166337 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=166337&action=review > Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:8 > + Fix bad usage of putDirect and removeDirect from JSDependentRetained and fix The JSC change looks good. > Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:9 > + incorrect assumptions about how weak handles work in V8. This is refactored The point of the V8 fix is: - Use m_owner.set() instead of m_owern =. - Call value->release() in the weak callback. Am I understanding correctly? > Source/WebCore/bindings/v8/V8DependentRetained.h:37 > +#include <wtf/text/StringBuilder.h> Nit: Why is this needed?
Elliott Sprehn
Comment 3 2012-09-28 17:57:16 PDT
Comment on attachment 166337 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=166337&action=review >> Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:9 >> + incorrect assumptions about how weak handles work in V8. This is refactored > > The point of the V8 fix is: > > - Use m_owner.set() instead of m_owern =. > - Call value->release() in the weak callback. > > Am I understanding correctly? - Yeah, need to use set() since ScopedPersistent doesn't have overloaded operator=. - I originally had one weakCallback and abarth suggested using two callbacks, one for the owner and one for the value and asserting about the order, but that was a wrong thing to do since the order of the callbacks doesn't seem to work as expected when v8 destroys everything (whole page navigate). No code uses this code yet, but if you did you'd get asserts. >> Source/WebCore/bindings/v8/V8DependentRetained.h:37 >> +#include <wtf/text/StringBuilder.h> > > Nit: Why is this needed? The code didn't compile because someone else refactored it before my other patch landed that actually uses this, and they made it use StringBuilder (see in the create createPropertyName method in the file). No one noticed it broke because nothing uses this yet.
Kentaro Hara
Comment 4 2012-09-28 17:59:07 PDT
Comment on attachment 166337 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=166337&action=review >>> Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:9 >>> + incorrect assumptions about how weak handles work in V8. This is refactored >> >> The point of the V8 fix is: >> >> - Use m_owner.set() instead of m_owern =. >> - Call value->release() in the weak callback. >> >> Am I understanding correctly? > > - Yeah, need to use set() since ScopedPersistent doesn't have overloaded operator=. > - I originally had one weakCallback and abarth suggested using two callbacks, one for the owner and one for the value and asserting about the order, but that was a wrong thing to do since the order of the callbacks doesn't seem to work as expected when v8 destroys everything (whole page navigate). No code uses this code yet, but if you did you'd get asserts. Makes sense. Thanks for the clarification!
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 5 2012-09-28 19:16:04 PDT
Comment on attachment 166337 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 166337 Committed r129968: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/129968>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 6 2012-09-28 19:16:07 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.