Bug 9213

Summary:

Absolutely positioned objects with relatively positioned inline containing blocks are rendered incorrectly

Product:

WebKit

Reporter:

Sam Weinig <sam>

Component:

Layout and Rendering

Assignee:

Nobody <webkit-unassigned>

Status:

RESOLVED FIXED

Severity:

Normal

CC:

joost, mike

Priority:

Version:

420+

Hardware:

Mac

OS:

OS X 10.4

Attachments:

Description	Flags
patch	none
patch 2	hyatt: review+

Sam Weinig

Reported 2006-06-01 11:51:38 PDT

CSS 2.1 specifies that an absolutely positioned object may have a relatively positioned inline element as its containing block, but in such cases the equation for determining the bounds change from the ordanary. Currently no browsers that I have tested fully implement the specified behavior.

Attachments
patch (22.57 KB, patch) 2006-06-01 12:01 PDT, Sam Weinig	no flags	Details Formatted Diff Diff
patch 2 (22.58 KB, patch) 2006-06-03 14:23 PDT, Sam Weinig	hyatt: review+	Details Formatted Diff Diff
Show Obsolete (1) View All Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc.

Sam Weinig

Comment 1 2006-06-01 12:01:43 PDT

Created attachment 8648 [details] patch

Dave Hyatt

Comment 2 2006-06-02 02:10:37 PDT

Typo in the comments in two places: "relativly" should be "relatively" Should we be worried about the fact that this doesn't match other browsers?

Joost de Valk (AlthA)

Comment 3 2006-06-02 02:14:32 PDT

I think we should.

Sam Weinig

Comment 4 2006-06-02 13:34:10 PDT

I would be happy to make a quirks mode variation, but I am really unsure what we want to emulate from the other browsers. Our current behavior does not match either Firefox or Opera (the only two I have access to), and I am not sure what we would want to mimic. I will of course fix the typos, but I would also love to know what a desired quirks mode behavior would be.

Sam Weinig

Comment 5 2006-06-03 14:23:43 PDT

Created attachment 8683 [details] patch 2 Fixes the misspellings.

Dave Hyatt

Comment 6 2006-06-04 11:53:22 PDT

Comment on attachment 8683 [details] patch 2 r=me

David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)

Comment 7 2006-06-04 14:57:15 PDT

(In reply to comment #6) > (From update of attachment 8683 [details] [edit]) > r=me There were no *-expected.txt results in this patch. In the future, it would be helpful to have these test results included in the patch to make sure a local build is working properly before commit. Thanks!

David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)

Comment 8 2006-06-04 15:36:54 PDT

Committed revision 14727.

mitz

Comment 9 2006-12-16 12:48:48 PST

*** Bug 5722 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.