Bug 83855

Summary: Visual artifacts when scrolling a <fieldset> with a legend
Product: WebKit Reporter: Félix Cloutier <felixcca>
Component: Layout and RenderingAssignee: SravanKumar S(:sravan) <ssandela>
Status: ASSIGNED ---    
Severity: Normal CC: mitz, mrahaman, ssandela, zcorpan
Priority: P2    
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Bug Depends on:    
Bug Blocks: 188643    
Attachments:
Description Flags
A test case demonstrating the visual artifacts caused by scrolling fieldsets none

Description Félix Cloutier 2012-04-12 19:42:01 PDT
Created attachment 137029 [details]
A test case demonstrating the visual artifacts caused by scrolling fieldsets

When a <fieldset> element with a <legend> is made scrollable (with the CSS overflow property), scrolling results in severe visual artifacts: the <legend> element itself can be scrolled out and elements inside the <fieldset> can overlap the top border.

Scroll down the <fieldset> element of the file I've attached to get a glimpse.
Comment 1 SravanKumar S(:sravan) 2012-05-08 02:59:38 PDT
This is happening because scroll-bar height is including not only fieldset height, but also legend height. I would like to fix it.
Comment 2 SravanKumar S(:sravan) 2012-05-10 02:11:32 PDT
After little more debugging, it is found that it is not scroll-bar height, but its LayoutRect(Y-co-ordinate and Height) is including LEGEND+FIELDSET LayouRects. But if it is treated as a bug, then we have to make Scroll-bar LayoutRect independent of LEGEND being present or not in FIELDSET.

FIELDSET spec does'nt really say anything about how LEGEND should be treated if overflow is present in FIELDSET. But, going by general LEGEND element purpose, it need not be part of scroll, as it only names the FIELDSET. Only the content should of FIELDSET should be scrollable, but not LEGEND.

Also, FF and IE9 are behaving more worse w.r.t to this Testcase. So, there is no fixed reference to follow. So, this should be WEBKIT specific implementation, on the basis of reasoning give in 2nd para.
Comment 3 Simon Pieters (:zcorpan) 2018-08-16 12:17:58 PDT
This seems to have been fixed by now?