Bug 67858

Summary: Pixel result shows that compositing/iframes/repaint-after-losing-scrollbars.html is failing
Product: WebKit Reporter: Simon Fraser (smfr) <simon.fraser>
Component: Layout and RenderingAssignee: Simon Fraser (smfr) <simon.fraser>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: Normal CC: bdakin, jamesr, ossy, simon.fraser
Priority: P2    
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Bug Depends on: 68872, 68893    
Bug Blocks:    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch none

Simon Fraser (smfr)
Reported 2011-09-09 11:26:24 PDT
Loading compositing/iframes/repaint-after-losing-scrollbars.html shows that the test is failing; the scrollbars remain visible on Mac in Safari.
Attachments
Patch (8.40 KB, patch)
2011-09-09 18:54 PDT, Simon Fraser (smfr)
no flags
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 1 2011-09-09 11:32:00 PDT
I have non-overlay scrollbars and am testing on Lion.
James Robinson
Comment 2 2011-09-09 11:45:22 PDT
The tests works as expected on chromium. On mac it looks like it's a graphical issue (the scrollbar pixels are there, but there's no actual scrollbar widget). Looks like we aren't routing an invalidation to the composited layer when the scrollbars vanish. I suspect that either those invalidations are going nowhere or to the root. Can you try on lion with overlay scrollbars? Mac with overlay scrollbars behaves almost identically to chromium.
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 3 2011-09-09 16:45:11 PDT
I don't see any code that does repaints when scrollbars come and go. Maybe we were just relying on the native widgets to repaint?
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 4 2011-09-09 18:48:53 PDT
I filed 67878 to track the pixel test issue.
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 5 2011-09-09 18:54:17 PDT
Darin Adler
Comment 6 2011-09-09 19:02:24 PDT
Comment on attachment 106952 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=106952&action=review > Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:15 > + Tested by compositing/iframes/repaint-after-losing-scrollbars.html, even though the pixel > + result doesn't show the correct result (bug 67878). Does the expected result of that test need to be updated, or is it already failing? > Source/WebCore/platform/ScrollView.cpp:583 > + if (!m_horizontalScrollbar && !m_verticalScrollbar && !oldScrollCornerRect.isEmpty()) > + invalidateScrollCornerRect(oldScrollCornerRect); I’m not sure I understand which call sites are responsible for checking if the rectangle is empty. There is a check here, but no check in RenderLayerCompositor::destroyRootLayer. Is it important to check everywhere? Or unnecessary to check anywhere? Or helpful to check in some places even if not in others? > Source/WebCore/rendering/RenderLayerCompositor.cpp:1746 > + m_renderView->frameView()->invalidateScrollCorner(m_renderView->frameView()->scrollCornerRect()); If frameView() is a non-trivial function it might be nice to call it only once.
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 7 2011-09-26 22:49:49 PDT
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 8 2011-09-26 23:37:16 PDT
(In reply to comment #7) > http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/96070 It made 2 tests crash on the Qt bot: fast/loader/stateobjects/pushstate-clears-forward-history.html fast/frames/frame-dead-region.html http://build.webkit.org/results/Qt%20Linux%20Release/r96070%20%2837910%29/results.html
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 10 2011-09-27 04:12:05 PDT
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 11 2011-09-27 06:06:03 PDT
Comment on attachment 106952 [details] Patch remove r+, because it was landed and rolled out and the bug is reopened.
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 12 2011-09-27 12:00:38 PDT
Back in in http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/96138. r96130 fixed the crash.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.