Summary: | Web Inspector: [Chromium] Valgrind signals use of uninitialized field in InspectorStyleSheetForInlineStyle | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Alexander Pavlov (apavlov) <apavlov> |
Component: | Web Inspector (Deprecated) | Assignee: | Alexander Pavlov (apavlov) <apavlov> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | Normal | CC: | apavlov, bweinstein, joepeck, keishi, loislo, pfeldman, pmuellr, rik, timothy, yurys |
Priority: | P2 | ||
Version: | 528+ (Nightly build) | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All |
Description
Alexander Pavlov (apavlov)
2011-09-09 03:28:46 PDT
Committed r94844: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/94844> Good catch and fix. I just happened to open up the bug and see no attached patch but a committed changeset. I think maybe this change should still have had a reviewer (even simple, non-build issues typically have reviews) but certainly a ChangeLog. In either case keep up the good fixes! (In reply to comment #2) > Good catch and fix. > > I just happened to open up the bug and see no attached patch but a committed > changeset. I think maybe this change should still have had a reviewer (even > simple, non-build issues typically have reviews) but certainly a ChangeLog. > In either case keep up the good fixes! Well, the change seemed trivial, so Pavel who was on vacation and was having difficulties doing the actual review (i.e. setting r+), said that it could surely be committed unreviewed (even though the change had a reviewer de facto, and there were no other reviewers around). I'll do my best finding a real reviewer from now on. It wasn't so much the review (I trust your judgement with the small change) it was the Missing ChangeLog that I wanted to call out. Either way thanks for the explanation! Also changes like this are easy to get a quick review from someone in #webkit if you need one. Or people like Darin are always checking the list of patches for review and might review without even being CC'd! (In reply to comment #4) > It wasn't so much the review (I trust your judgement with the small change) > it was the Missing ChangeLog that I wanted to call out. Either way thanks > for the explanation! As you rightly pointed out, there was a ChangeLog. I don't know how I missed that =(. Thanks for following up. |