Summary: | gardening server should have an API for parsing changelogs | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Adam Barth <abarth> | ||||||
Component: | New Bugs | Assignee: | Adam Barth <abarth> | ||||||
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||||||||
Severity: | Normal | CC: | eric | ||||||
Priority: | P2 | ||||||||
Version: | 528+ (Nightly build) | ||||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
Bug Depends on: | |||||||||
Bug Blocks: | 64183 | ||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Adam Barth
2011-07-13 17:48:56 PDT
Created attachment 100741 [details]
Patch
Comment on attachment 100741 [details]
Patch
I wonder why you wouldn't want to add a to_json() method to CommitInfo instead.
Created attachment 100745 [details]
Patch
Comment on attachment 100745 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=100745&action=review Seems OK. > Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/tool/servers/gardeningserver.py:61 > + head_revision = self.server.tool.scm().head_svn_revision() > + if revision > head_revision: Seems like we want some sort of "includes_revision()" check somewhere here. Either on this class, or preferably on SCM itself. This is OK, but such code sharing might be better. Comment on attachment 100745 [details]
Patch
I'm not going to worry about the includes_revision thing now. These are easy to find later by grepping for head_svn_revision.
Comment on attachment 100745 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 100745 Committed r90968: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/90968> All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug. |