|Summary:||Define the order of traversing elements in shadow content when focusing|
|Product:||WebKit||Reporter:||Hayato Ito <hayato>|
|Severity:||Normal||CC:||dglazkov, dominicc, morrita, rolandsteiner, shinyak|
|Version:||528+ (Nightly build)|
|Bug Depends on:||64072|
|Bug Blocks:||72352, 61409|
Description Hayato Ito 2011-06-28 02:26:39 PDT
Elements in a shadow root can be traversed by bug 61410, but elements in shadow content is not included in this traversal. It would be nice that we can define a rule so that we can traverse 'elements in shadow root' and 'elements in shadow content' in a 'mixed' way.
Comment 1 Dominic Cooney 2011-11-20 18:26:39 PST
My gut feeling is that we should follow the XBL-style tree flattening algorithm and then apply focus traversal over that. Thoughts?
Comment 2 Hayato Ito 2011-11-20 18:38:49 PST
Yeah, we need a flattened tree somehow. I made this bug depends on bug 64072. Let me investigate how we should get a 'flattened' tree. (In reply to comment #1) > My gut feeling is that we should follow the XBL-style tree flattening algorithm and then apply focus traversal over that. Thoughts?
Comment 3 Dominic Cooney 2012-01-10 22:34:41 PST
Per the spec focus navigation works over the flattened (“as-rendered” in spec language) tree. <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/shadow/index.html#focus-navigation>