Bug 60421

Summary: Custom scrollbars nested inside an overlay scrollbar overflow region end up painting twice
Product: WebKit Reporter: Beth Dakin <bdakin>
Component: Layout and RenderingAssignee: Nobody <webkit-unassigned>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: Normal CC: bdakin
Priority: P2 Keywords: HasReduction, InRadar
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch darin: review+

Beth Dakin
Reported 2011-05-06 17:36:49 PDT
Right now any overflow region with overlay scrollbars will cause a second pass through the layer tree to paint said scrollbars. Except right now both passes end up painting custom css scrollbars. Patch forthcoming. <rdar://problem/9389072>
Attachments
Patch (29.63 KB, patch)
2011-05-06 17:46 PDT, Beth Dakin
darin: review+
Beth Dakin
Comment 1 2011-05-06 17:46:23 PDT
Beth Dakin
Comment 2 2011-05-06 17:47:16 PDT
This test doesn't do anything right now, but when we have a version of DRT that uses overlay scrollbars, then this test will be valuable.
Darin Adler
Comment 3 2011-05-06 17:47:59 PDT
Comment on attachment 92665 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=92665&action=review > Source/WebCore/rendering/RenderLayer.cpp:2254 > + // If this is the special overlay scrollbar painting pass, then don't re-paint any > + // non-overlay scrollbars. Only custom-CSS scrollbars will be non-overlay in this > + // context. This comment seems a little long. Maybe you could remove more of what's redundant with the code and concentrate on the why part of this?
Beth Dakin
Comment 4 2011-05-06 17:53:07 PDT
(In reply to comment #3) > (From update of attachment 92665 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=92665&action=review > > > Source/WebCore/rendering/RenderLayer.cpp:2254 > > + // If this is the special overlay scrollbar painting pass, then don't re-paint any > > + // non-overlay scrollbars. Only custom-CSS scrollbars will be non-overlay in this > > + // context. > > This comment seems a little long. Maybe you could remove more of what's redundant with the code and concentrate on the why part of this? Thanks Darin! I changed it to a better, more-concise comment. Committed with revision 85990.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.