Bug 52495

Summary: Beef up PrintContext for WebKit2
Product: WebKit Reporter: Alexey Proskuryakov <ap>
Component: PrintingAssignee: Alexey Proskuryakov <ap>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: Normal CC: hyatt, webkit-ews
Priority: P2    
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Attachments:
Description Flags
proposed patch mitz: review+

Alexey Proskuryakov
Reported 2011-01-14 16:36:36 PST
Patch forthcoming.
Attachments
proposed patch (11.80 KB, patch)
2011-01-14 17:15 PST, Alexey Proskuryakov
mitz: review+
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 1 2011-01-14 17:15:02 PST
Created attachment 79037 [details] proposed patch
Early Warning System Bot
Comment 2 2011-01-14 17:44:13 PST
mitz
Comment 3 2011-01-14 17:45:34 PST
Comment on attachment 79037 [details] proposed patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=79037&action=review > Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:19 > + Round pahe height to an integer, because Mac code does that, and because page height is Typo: pahe > Source/WebCore/page/PrintContext.cpp:35 > +// print in IE and Camino. This lets them use fewer sheets than they Camino, really? > Source/WebCore/page/PrintContext.cpp:38 > +const float PrintingMinimumShrinkFactor = 1.25f; Can you drop the f? Our current style is to use a lowercase p here. Not sure there’s a reason to say “printing” in this context. > Source/WebCore/page/PrintContext.cpp:44 > +const float PrintingMaximumShrinkFactor = 2.0f; Can you drop the .0f and use a lowercase P? > Source/WebCore/page/PrintContext.cpp:68 > +void PrintContext::computePageRects(const FloatRect& printRect, float headerHeight, float footerHeight, float userScaleFactor, float& outPageHeight, bool allowHorizontalMultiPages) I have no idea what a multi-page is. Perhaps allowHorizontalTiling or allowTilingHorizontally? > Source/WebCore/page/PrintContext.cpp:141 > + return 1.0f; Is the .0f necessary? > Source/WebCore/page/PrintContext.cpp:145 > + return 1.0f; Ditto > Source/WebCore/page/PrintContext.cpp:147 > + float maxShrinkToFitScaleFactor = 1.0f / PrintingMaximumShrinkFactor; This .0f is not needed.
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 4 2011-01-17 10:31:52 PST
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.