Summary: | HTMLInputElement of type range is not controllable by assistive technologies | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Eric Carlson <eric.carlson> | ||||
Component: | Accessibility | Assignee: | Eric Carlson <eric.carlson> | ||||
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||||||
Severity: | Normal | CC: | bdakin, darin, eric | ||||
Priority: | P2 | ||||||
Version: | 528+ (Nightly build) | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | All | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Eric Carlson
2009-08-03 07:53:07 PDT
Created attachment 33976 [details]
proposed patch
Comment on attachment 33976 [details]
proposed patch
Seems this should be in some sort of method on HTMLInputElement instead:
8 // Fire change event manually, as RenderSlider::setValueForPosition does.
109 input->dispatchFormControlChangeEvent();
Null check needed?
ntRect AccessibilitySliderThumb::elementRect() const
139 {
140 IntRect intRect = static_cast<RenderSlider*>(m_parentSlider->renderer())->thumbRect();
141 FloatQuad floatQuad = m_parentSlider->renderer()->localToAbsoluteQuad(FloatRect(intRect));
142
Eventually we should write a helper to do this:
296 thumbRect.setWidth(thumb->style()->width().calcMinValue(contentWidth()));
297 thumbRect.setHeight(thumb->style()->height().calcMinValue(contentHeight()));
I feel like we do that often all over the code. :)
Same is true with the centering algorithms you use in the next line. :) (Not for this patch, just noting that eventually we'll need more Rect/Point math code.)
I find AccessibilityUIElement.h is a confusing name for this DRT-only class.
It's sad that everyone replicates the js-testing harness in their tests. :( You know about fast/js/resources/, TEMPLATE.html, and make-js-tests right?
In general this looks fine though.
I was slightly surprised to see no response to my comments. ;) Oh, I took the final line in your comment literally, sorry. For completeness: I added the NULL check, and I did not know about TEMPLATE.html or make-js-tests (but do now, thanks!). (In reply to comment #5) > Oh, I took the final line in your comment literally, sorry. It was definitely intended literarily! So you took it as intended. :) > For completeness: I added the NULL check, and I did not know about > TEMPLATE.html or make-js-tests (but do now, thanks!). Excellent. Mostly I wanted to hear that you had added the null check when landing. Thanks! |