Summary: | Fragment identifiers should be applied to canonical URL when sharing, bookmarking | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Dan <dan> |
Component: | New Bugs | Assignee: | Nobody <webkit-unassigned> |
Status: | NEW --- | ||
Severity: | Normal | CC: | achristensen, jonas, megan_gardner, thorton, webkit-bug-importer |
Priority: | P2 | Keywords: | InRadar |
Version: | Safari 16 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified |
Description
Dan
2023-01-09 04:59:18 PST
Apologies for typos and unclear prose. The second paragraph should have read: "Since fragment identifiers are a client-only feature that is *not* reproduced in the canonical URL,..." The link to Wikipedia was meant to illustrate document fragment usage on a high-profile website that uses <link rel=canonical>. Opening the link in iOS Safari and using the share panel, the fragment is lost. Finally, "iOS Safari should at least transfer the fragment..." was meant to be followed by "if not renounce sharing canonical URLs altogether". |