[GStreamer] De-initialize GStreamer before terminating WebProcess

• Component: Platform
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Philippe Normand]

Allowing the leak tracer to report/log leaks. From https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217655#c42

[Philippe Normand]

Created attachment 452976 [details]
Patch

[Carlos Garcia Campos]

Comment on attachment 452976 [details]
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=452976&action=review

> Source/WebKit/WebProcess/glib/WebProcessGLib.cpp:88
> +#if USE(GSTREAMER)
> +    gst_deinit();
> +#endif

I think the right place for this is WebProcessMainGtk.cpp and WebProcessMainWPE.cpp. You need to override platformFinalize(). Closing the pages is done here because m_pageMap is private.

[Philippe Normand]

Created attachment 452977 [details]
Patch

[Carlos Garcia Campos]

Comment on attachment 452977 [details]
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=452977&action=review

> Source/WebKit/WebProcess/gtk/WebProcessMainGtk.cpp:75
> +#if USE(GSTREAMER)
> +        gst_deinit();
> +#endif

Don't we need to include a gst header for this?

> Source/WebKit/WebProcess/wpe/WebProcessMainWPE.cpp:107
> +#if USE(GSTREAMER)
> +        gst_deinit();
> +#endif

Ditto.

[Philippe Normand]

Somehow they were pulled in, the magics of unified builds I suppose. Anyway yes, I'll add explicit includes, it won't hurt.

[Philippe Normand]

Created attachment 452979 [details]
Patch

[Michael Catanzaro]

(In reply to Philippe Normand from comment #5)
> Somehow they were pulled in, the magics of unified builds I suppose. Anyway
> yes, I'll add explicit includes, it won't hurt.

You'll save Adrian from fixing it after you ;)

[EWS]

Committed r290375 (247691@main): <https://commits.webkit.org/247691@main>

All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug and clearing flags on attachment 452979 [details].

[Radar WebKit Bug Importer]

<rdar://problem/89357593>

[Adrian Perez]

(In reply to Michael Catanzaro from comment #7)
> (In reply to Philippe Normand from comment #5)
> > Somehow they were pulled in, the magics of unified builds I suppose. Anyway
> > yes, I'll add explicit includes, it won't hurt.
> 
> You'll save Adrian from fixing it after you ;)

Indeed! Thanks for adding the explicit includes 😁️