| Summary: | Make a consistent way to compute applied opacity | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Simon Fraser (smfr) <simon.fraser> |
| Component: | Layout and Rendering | Assignee: | Nobody <webkit-unassigned> |
| Status: | NEW --- | ||
| Severity: | Normal | CC: | andresg_22, bfulgham, ntim, simon.fraser, webkit-bug-importer, zalan |
| Priority: | P2 | Keywords: | InRadar |
| Version: | Safari Technology Preview | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
|
Description
Simon Fraser (smfr)
2022-01-14 10:46:12 PST
HTMLPlugInElement::isReplacementObscured() and ContentChangeObserver::isVisuallyHidden() do the same thing. And RenderLayer::isTransparentRespectingParentFrames() HTMLPlugInElement::isReplacementObscured() and RenderLayer::isTransparentRespectingParentFrames() use the layer parent() chain so bug 235194 fixes them. ContentChangeObserver::isVisuallyHidden() is wrong. Would walking up the stacking context chain be a fix here? Walking paintOrderParent(), yes. AXObjectCache::isNodeVisible() was the example mentioned in the original bug title. |