Bug 235240
Summary: | Make a consistent way to compute applied opacity | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Simon Fraser (smfr) <simon.fraser> |
Component: | Layout and Rendering | Assignee: | Nobody <webkit-unassigned> |
Status: | NEW | ||
Severity: | Normal | CC: | andresg_22, bfulgham, ntim, simon.fraser, webkit-bug-importer, zalan |
Priority: | P2 | Keywords: | InRadar |
Version: | Safari Technology Preview | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified |
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Walking the renderer parent chain is wrong with top layer (dialog, ::backdrop).
Attachments | ||
---|---|---|
Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc. |
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
<rdar://problem/87607943>
Simon Fraser (smfr)
HTMLPlugInElement::isReplacementObscured() and ContentChangeObserver::isVisuallyHidden() do the same thing.
Simon Fraser (smfr)
And RenderLayer::isTransparentRespectingParentFrames()
Simon Fraser (smfr)
HTMLPlugInElement::isReplacementObscured() and RenderLayer::isTransparentRespectingParentFrames() use the layer parent() chain so bug 235194 fixes them. ContentChangeObserver::isVisuallyHidden() is wrong.
Tim Nguyen (:ntim)
Would walking up the stacking context chain be a fix here?
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Walking paintOrderParent(), yes.
Tim Nguyen (:ntim)
AXObjectCache::isNodeVisible() was the example mentioned in the original bug title.