Bug 234477

Summary: Use smart pointers for WebCoreNSURLSessionDataTask ObjC members
Product: WebKit Reporter: Alex Christensen <achristensen>
Component: New BugsAssignee: Alex Christensen <achristensen>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: Normal CC: beidson, darin, webkit-bug-importer
Priority: P2 Keywords: InRadar
Version: WebKit Nightly Build   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch
none
Patch none

Alex Christensen
Reported 2021-12-18 09:23:45 PST
Use smart pointers for WebCoreNSURLSessionDataTask ObjC members
Attachments
Patch (4.51 KB, patch)
2021-12-18 09:24 PST, Alex Christensen
no flags
Patch (5.50 KB, patch)
2021-12-18 12:45 PST, Alex Christensen
no flags
Alex Christensen
Comment 1 2021-12-18 09:24:16 PST
Alex Christensen
Comment 2 2021-12-18 09:24:20 PST
Alex Christensen
Comment 3 2021-12-18 12:44:43 PST
These properties are marked as (copy). Will do copying and autoreleasing.
Alex Christensen
Comment 4 2021-12-18 12:45:07 PST
EWS
Comment 5 2021-12-18 13:35:17 PST
Committed r287230 (245391@main): <https://commits.webkit.org/245391@main> All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug and clearing flags on attachment 447528 [details].
Darin Adler
Comment 6 2021-12-19 15:53:16 PST
Comment on attachment 447528 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=447528&action=review > Source/WebCore/platform/network/cocoa/WebCoreNSURLSession.mm:803 > +- (NSURLRequest *)originalRequest > +{ > + return adoptNS([_originalRequest copy]).autorelease(); > +} > + > +- (NSURLRequest *)currentRequest > +{ > + return adoptNS([_currentRequest copy]).autorelease(); > +} > + > +- (NSError *)error > +{ > + return adoptNS([_error copy]).autorelease(); > +} > + > +- (NSString *)taskDescription > +{ > + return adoptNS([_taskDescription copy]).autorelease(); > +} > + > +- (void)setTaskDescription:(NSString *)description > +{ > + _taskDescription = adoptNS([description copy]); > +} Was the old code doing these copies and autoreleases? It’s not a given that they must be done just because a smart pointer is involved. They might be good changes in their own right, but need to explain why typically.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.