Bug 214690

Summary: Add support for SVGAElement's rel / relList attributes
Product: WebKit Reporter: Chris Dumez <cdumez>
Component: SVGAssignee: Chris Dumez <cdumez>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: Normal CC: achristensen, changseok, darin, dino, esprehn+autocc, ews-watchlist, fmalita, ggaren, gyuyoung.kim, kondapallykalyan, pdr, rwlbuis, sabouhallawa, schenney, sergio, webkit-bug-importer, youennf, zimmermann
Priority: P2 Keywords: InRadar
Version: WebKit Nightly Build   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/linking.html#InterfaceSVGAElement
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch
none
Patch
none
Patch
none
Patch
none
Patch
none
Patch none

Chris Dumez
Reported 2020-07-23 10:22:10 PDT
Add support for SVGAElement's rel / relList attributes: https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/linking.html#InterfaceSVGAElement
Attachments
Patch (10.85 KB, patch)
2020-07-23 10:23 PDT, Chris Dumez
no flags
Patch (12.92 KB, patch)
2020-07-23 10:45 PDT, Chris Dumez
no flags
Patch (13.34 KB, patch)
2020-07-23 11:45 PDT, Chris Dumez
no flags
Patch (14.39 KB, patch)
2020-07-23 12:02 PDT, Chris Dumez
no flags
Patch (15.07 KB, patch)
2020-07-23 12:19 PDT, Chris Dumez
no flags
Patch (15.29 KB, patch)
2020-07-23 12:49 PDT, Chris Dumez
no flags
Chris Dumez
Comment 1 2020-07-23 10:23:14 PDT
Darin Adler
Comment 2 2020-07-23 10:29:42 PDT
Comment on attachment 405052 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=405052&action=review > Source/WebCore/svg/SVGAElement.cpp:86 > + return; Wish I understood whether we should call to base or return in cases like this. I suppose return is a slight optimization, whereas calling through to base is a little more consistent and allows for each level to implement part of attribute handling, which could be handy in some cases. > Source/WebCore/svg/SVGAElement.cpp:231 > + m_relList = makeUnique<DOMTokenList>(const_cast<SVGAElement&>(*this), SVGNames::relAttr, [](Document&, StringView token) { This const_cast makes me wonder about ever using const for functions in these element classes. Is there anything meaningful to the use of const in the class definition? I understand that conceptually it does not change the state of the element. But also, making a DOMTokenList doesn’t seem to change the element either, so why does it take a non-const reference. Except for the fact that everything takes non-const references to classes like Node and Element. > Source/WebCore/svg/SVGAElement.cpp:236 > +#if USE(SYSTEM_PREVIEW) > + return equalIgnoringASCIICase(token, "noreferrer") || equalIgnoringASCIICase(token, "noopener") || equalIgnoringASCIICase(token, "ar"); > +#else > + return equalIgnoringASCIICase(token, "noreferrer") || equalIgnoringASCIICase(token, "noopener"); > +#endif Is there a less repetitive way to write this? Maybe: #if USE(SYSTEM_PREVIEW) if (equalIgnoringASCIICase(token, "ar")) return true; #endif Then the rest doesn’t have to be inside #if. > Source/WebCore/svg/SVGAElement.idl:30 > + [SameObject, PutForwards=value] readonly attribute DOMTokenList relList; Not sure I understand the meaning of PutForwards=value, but whatever it is, glad the generator handles it.
Chris Dumez
Comment 3 2020-07-23 10:37:46 PDT
Comment on attachment 405052 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=405052&action=review >> Source/WebCore/svg/SVGAElement.cpp:86 >> + return; > > Wish I understood whether we should call to base or return in cases like this. I suppose return is a slight optimization, whereas calling through to base is a little more consistent and allows for each level to implement part of attribute handling, which could be handy in some cases. Yes, this is a slight optimization and seems to be the existing pattern in parseAttribute() functions. >> Source/WebCore/svg/SVGAElement.cpp:231 >> + m_relList = makeUnique<DOMTokenList>(const_cast<SVGAElement&>(*this), SVGNames::relAttr, [](Document&, StringView token) { > > This const_cast makes me wonder about ever using const for functions in these element classes. Is there anything meaningful to the use of const in the class definition? I understand that conceptually it does not change the state of the element. But also, making a DOMTokenList doesn’t seem to change the element either, so why does it take a non-const reference. Except for the fact that everything takes non-const references to classes like Node and Element. While constructing a DOMTokenList does not modify the element, the JS can modify an element (the element's attribute) via the DOMTokenList. The DOMTokenList needs to be able to update attributes on the element, which is why it takes in a non-const reference. I guess I should just drop the const on relList() function. >> Source/WebCore/svg/SVGAElement.cpp:236 >> +#endif > > Is there a less repetitive way to write this? Maybe: > > #if USE(SYSTEM_PREVIEW) > if (equalIgnoringASCIICase(token, "ar")) > return true; > #endif > > Then the rest doesn’t have to be inside #if. Ok. >> Source/WebCore/svg/SVGAElement.idl:30 >> + [SameObject, PutForwards=value] readonly attribute DOMTokenList relList; > > Not sure I understand the meaning of PutForwards=value, but whatever it is, glad the generator handles it. causes this: a.relList = "foo" to be equivalent to: a.relList.value = "foo" The most popular use is likely for window.location which actually sets window.location.href. https://heycam.github.io/webidl/#PutForwards
Chris Dumez
Comment 4 2020-07-23 10:45:58 PDT
Chris Dumez
Comment 5 2020-07-23 11:45:58 PDT
Chris Dumez
Comment 6 2020-07-23 12:02:18 PDT
Chris Dumez
Comment 7 2020-07-23 12:19:22 PDT
Chris Dumez
Comment 8 2020-07-23 12:49:54 PDT
EWS
Comment 9 2020-07-23 14:05:32 PDT
Committed r264789: <https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/264789> All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug and clearing flags on attachment 405069 [details].
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 10 2020-07-23 14:06:30 PDT
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.