Bug 196893

Summary: [Cocoa] WKCustomProtocolLoader should store a WeakPtr to its LegacyCustomProtocolManagerProxy
Product: WebKit Reporter: Andy Estes <aestes>
Component: New BugsAssignee: Andy Estes <aestes>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: Normal CC: achristensen, andersca, beidson, cdumez, commit-queue, darin, mcatanzaro, thorton, webkit-bug-importer
Priority: P2 Keywords: InRadar
Version: WebKit Nightly Build   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
See Also: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196905
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch
none
Patch
none
Patch none

Description Andy Estes 2019-04-12 20:20:21 PDT
[Cocoa] WKCustomProtocolLoader should store a WeakPtr to its LegacyCustomProtocolManagerProxy
Comment 1 Andy Estes 2019-04-12 20:26:00 PDT
rdar://problem/48318983
Comment 2 Andy Estes 2019-04-12 20:27:06 PDT Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 3 Andy Estes 2019-04-12 21:05:24 PDT
Created attachment 367377 [details]
Patch
Comment 4 Anders Carlsson 2019-04-13 07:57:58 PDT
Comment on attachment 367377 [details]
Patch

Assuming there are no thread safety issues and that LegacyCustomProtocolManagerProxy is always called from the same (main?) thread, r=me.
Comment 5 Darin Adler 2019-04-13 07:58:50 PDT
Comment on attachment 367377 [details]
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=367377&action=review

Kinda wish we still canceled the load when the weak pointer became null.

> Source/WebKit/UIProcess/Cocoa/LegacyCustomProtocolManagerClient.mm:-77
> -    ASSERT(_customProtocolManagerProxy);

I think this assertion might still be good. The WeakPtr can protect us from mistakes, but we should always be canceling before destroying the proxy, for efficiency reasons if no other reasons.

> Source/WebKit/UIProcess/Cocoa/LegacyCustomProtocolManagerClient.mm:-78
> -    _customProtocolManagerProxy = nullptr;

Still might be good to null this out. Not sure.

> Source/WebKit/UIProcess/Cocoa/LegacyCustomProtocolManagerClient.mm:119
> -    if (redirectResponse) {
> +    if (_customProtocolManagerProxy && redirectResponse) {
>          _customProtocolManagerProxy->wasRedirectedToRequest(_customProtocolID, request, redirectResponse);
>          return nil;
>      }

Seems to me that if _customProtocolManagerProxy is null we should return nil, not request.
Comment 6 Andy Estes 2019-04-13 13:51:51 PDT
(In reply to Anders Carlsson from comment #4)
> Comment on attachment 367377 [details]
> Patch
> 
> Assuming there are no thread safety issues and that
> LegacyCustomProtocolManagerProxy is always called from the same (main?)
> thread, r=me.

LegacyCustomProtocolManagerProxy is always called from the main thread. Thanks for reviewing!
Comment 7 Andy Estes 2019-04-13 13:53:24 PDT
(In reply to Darin Adler from comment #5)
> Comment on attachment 367377 [details]
> Patch
> 
> View in context:
> https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=367377&action=review
> 
> Kinda wish we still canceled the load when the weak pointer became null.

We should still cancel, because LegacyCustomProtocolManagerClient::invalidate() will still be called when the LegacyCustomProtocolManagerProxy is destroyed.

> 
> > Source/WebKit/UIProcess/Cocoa/LegacyCustomProtocolManagerClient.mm:-77
> > -    ASSERT(_customProtocolManagerProxy);
> 
> I think this assertion might still be good. The WeakPtr can protect us from
> mistakes, but we should always be canceling before destroying the proxy, for
> efficiency reasons if no other reasons.
> 
> > Source/WebKit/UIProcess/Cocoa/LegacyCustomProtocolManagerClient.mm:-78
> > -    _customProtocolManagerProxy = nullptr;
> 
> Still might be good to null this out. Not sure.

I restored the assertion and the nulling.

> 
> > Source/WebKit/UIProcess/Cocoa/LegacyCustomProtocolManagerClient.mm:119
> > -    if (redirectResponse) {
> > +    if (_customProtocolManagerProxy && redirectResponse) {
> >          _customProtocolManagerProxy->wasRedirectedToRequest(_customProtocolID, request, redirectResponse);
> >          return nil;
> >      }
> 
> Seems to me that if _customProtocolManagerProxy is null we should return
> nil, not request.

Yes, that makes more sense.

Thanks for your comments!
Comment 8 Andy Estes 2019-04-13 14:10:52 PDT
Created attachment 367391 [details]
Patch
Comment 9 Andy Estes 2019-04-14 08:40:41 PDT
The api-mac failure is due to a flaky API test. I filed <https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196905>.
Comment 10 WebKit Commit Bot 2019-04-14 09:08:29 PDT
Comment on attachment 367391 [details]
Patch

Clearing flags on attachment: 367391

Committed r244246: <https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/244246>
Comment 11 WebKit Commit Bot 2019-04-14 09:08:30 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed.  Closing bug.