Web Inspector: DOM: "Capture Screenshot" should only be shown if the node is attached

• Component: Web Inspector
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Devin Rousso]

I shouldn't be able to capture a screenshot of any random node that I've logged to the console (e.g. `document.createElement("div")`).

[Radar WebKit Bug Importer]

<rdar://problem/48916594>

[Devin Rousso]

Created attachment 364777 [details]
Patch

[Joseph Pecoraro]

Comment on attachment 364777 [details]
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=364777&action=review

> Source/WebInspectorUI/UserInterface/Views/ContextMenuUtilities.js:239
> -    if (window.PageAgent) {
> +    if (window.PageAgent && domNode.ownerDocument) {

This feels wrong.

Every Node should be associated with a document:

    document.createElement("div").ownerDocument; // => #document

We may want to update our interface, as it doesn't make sense that a detached node doesn't have an ownerDocument...

It might be good to have an isAttached() method that resolves this state.

[Devin Rousso]

Comment on attachment 364777 [details]
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=364777&action=review

>> Source/WebInspectorUI/UserInterface/Views/ContextMenuUtilities.js:239
>> +    if (window.PageAgent && domNode.ownerDocument) {
> 
> This feels wrong.
> 
> Every Node should be associated with a document:
> 
>     document.createElement("div").ownerDocument; // => #document
> 
> We may want to update our interface, as it doesn't make sense that a detached node doesn't have an ownerDocument...
> 
> It might be good to have an isAttached() method that resolves this state.

I would agree, but this is the current "reality" of how we're able to determine such things.  When we push a detached root to the frontend (e.g. logging a node which you've just created), we don't set a document for it (`WI.DOMManager.prototype._setDetachedRoot`).  I'd like to rework this when doing the DOM agent redesign as well.

[Joseph Pecoraro]

> > It might be good to have an isAttached() method that resolves this state.
> 
> I would agree, but this is the current "reality" of how we're able to
> determine such things.  When we push a detached root to the frontend (e.g.
> logging a node which you've just created), we don't set a document for it
> (`WI.DOMManager.prototype._setDetachedRoot`).  I'd like to rework this when
> doing the DOM agent redesign as well.

There should be another way to check if we are actually attached or not, perhaps by walking up the parentNode hierarchy.

[Devin Rousso]

Created attachment 365115 [details]
Patch

[Joseph Pecoraro]

Comment on attachment 365115 [details]
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=365115&action=review

r=me

> Source/WebInspectorUI/UserInterface/Views/ContextMenuUtilities.js:210
> -    if (WI.domDebuggerManager.supported && isElement && !domNode.isPseudoElement() && domNode.ownerDocument) {
> +    if (WI.domDebuggerManager.supported &&isElement && !domNode.isPseudoElement() && attached) {

Style: Oops on the lost space.

> Source/WebInspectorUI/UserInterface/Views/DOMTreeElement.js:781
> +        if (WI.cssManager.canForcePseudoClasses() && this.representedObject.attached) {

Might want to extract the attached into a bool hear to avoid people potentially recomputing it later.

[Devin Rousso]

Created attachment 365179 [details]
Patch

[WebKit Commit Bot]

Comment on attachment 365179 [details]
Patch

Clearing flags on attachment: 365179

Committed r243152: <https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/243152>

[WebKit Commit Bot]

All reviewed patches have been landed.  Closing bug.