Bug 184899
| Summary: | Investigate a better heuristic for when to prewarm a process | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Saam Barati <saam> |
| Component: | WebKit2 | Assignee: | Saam Barati <saam> |
| Status: | NEW | ||
| Severity: | Normal | CC: | achristensen, beidson, cdumez, fpizlo, ggaren, msaboff, rniwa, webkit-bug-importer |
| Priority: | P2 | Keywords: | InRadar |
| Version: | WebKit Nightly Build | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| See Also: | https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184765 | ||
Saam Barati
Some ideas:
- on the 'load' event
- a timer X ms after the 'load' event.
Or some combination of a timer an load event or first paint.
Perhaps there are other heuristics as well
| Attachments | ||
|---|---|---|
| Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc. |
Saam Barati
one way the current heuristic falls down is:
- load "a.com" <-- does prewarm a process
- press a link on "a.com" going to "b.com" <-- uses the prewarmed process
- Go back (to "a.com" <--- does not prewarm a process
- press a link on "a.com" for "c.com" <-- does not use a prewarmed process because one doesn't exist
So we should take into account prewarming a process when using back/forward cache
Saam Barati
(In reply to Saam Barati from comment #1)
> one way the current heuristic falls down is:
> - load "a.com" <-- does prewarm a process
> - press a link on "a.com" going to "b.com" <-- uses the prewarmed process
> - Go back (to "a.com" <--- does not prewarm a process
> - press a link on "a.com" for "c.com" <-- does not use a prewarmed process
> because one doesn't exist
>
> So we should take into account prewarming a process when using back/forward
> cache
actually, I'm off here. Maybe we don't need to do anything, since we do end up using a prewarmed process for "c.com", because "b.com" will prewarm a process
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
<rdar://problem/40094910>
Geoffrey Garen
I think we also need to merge navigation process prewarming with the process prewarming we already do to speed up launch.
Saam Barati
(In reply to Geoffrey Garen from comment #4)
> I think we also need to merge navigation process prewarming with the process
> prewarming we already do to speed up launch.
Merge in what sense? They both call the same codepath if that’s what you mean
Geoffrey Garen
> Merge in what sense? They both call the same codepath if that’s what you mean
Yeah, I guess that's what I mean. :P