Add API::IconDatabaseClient

• Component: WebKit2
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Carlos Garcia Campos]

We will use this instead of the C API in GTK+.

[Carlos Garcia Campos]

Created attachment 312418 [details]
Patch

[Alex Christensen]

Comment on attachment 312418 [details]
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=312418&action=review

> Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/WebIconDatabase.h:118
> +    std::unique_ptr<API::IconDatabaseClient> m_client;

I think this is wrong.  Usually we have the API object own the WebKit namespace object.

[Carlos Garcia Campos]

Comment on attachment 312418 [details]
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=312418&action=review

>> Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/WebIconDatabase.h:118
>> +    std::unique_ptr<API::IconDatabaseClient> m_client;
> 
> I think this is wrong.  Usually we have the API object own the WebKit namespace object.

Could you point to an example? I think I've followed what all other objects do. 

 - WebPageProxy in WebKit namespace owns API::LoaderClient, API::PolicyClient, API::NavigationClient, and a lot more clients
 - WebProcessPool in WebKit namespace owns API::AutomationClient, API::DownloadClient, API::LegacyContextHistoryClient and API::CustomProtocolManagerClient

or did I misunderstand what you mean?

[Alex Christensen]

Comment on attachment 312418 [details]
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=312418&action=review

> Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/APIIconDatabaseClient.h:2
> + * Copyright (C) 2014 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.

2017

>>> Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/WebIconDatabase.h:118
>>> +    std::unique_ptr<API::IconDatabaseClient> m_client;
>> 
>> I think this is wrong.  Usually we have the API object own the WebKit namespace object.
> 
> Could you point to an example? I think I've followed what all other objects do. 
> 
>  - WebPageProxy in WebKit namespace owns API::LoaderClient, API::PolicyClient, API::NavigationClient, and a lot more clients
>  - WebProcessPool in WebKit namespace owns API::AutomationClient, API::DownloadClient, API::LegacyContextHistoryClient and API::CustomProtocolManagerClient
> 
> or did I misunderstand what you mean?

After talking to some people, I now think this is correct.  Sorry about the misunderstanding.  API namespace objects own WebKit namespace objects, but clients pass calls in the opposite direction.  This is correct.
We should us a UniqueRef here because it's never null.

[Carlos Garcia Campos]

(In reply to Alex Christensen from comment #4)
> Comment on attachment 312418 [details]
> Patch
> 
> View in context:
> https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=312418&action=review
> 
> > Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/APIIconDatabaseClient.h:2
> > + * Copyright (C) 2014 Apple Inc. All rights reserved.
> 
> 2017
> 
> >>> Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/WebIconDatabase.h:118
> >>> +    std::unique_ptr<API::IconDatabaseClient> m_client;
> >> 
> >> I think this is wrong.  Usually we have the API object own the WebKit namespace object.
> > 
> > Could you point to an example? I think I've followed what all other objects do. 
> > 
> >  - WebPageProxy in WebKit namespace owns API::LoaderClient, API::PolicyClient, API::NavigationClient, and a lot more clients
> >  - WebProcessPool in WebKit namespace owns API::AutomationClient, API::DownloadClient, API::LegacyContextHistoryClient and API::CustomProtocolManagerClient
> > 
> > or did I misunderstand what you mean?
> 
> After talking to some people, I now think this is correct.  Sorry about the
> misunderstanding.

np, the whole thing is indeed confusing at first.

>  API namespace objects own WebKit namespace objects, but
> clients pass calls in the opposite direction.  This is correct.
> We should us a UniqueRef here because it's never null.

Didn't know UniqueRef, do you want me to change this patch before landing to use UniqueRef, or better do that in a follow up and switch all clients to UniqueRef?

[Alex Christensen]

Switching all clients to UniqueRef would be nice.

[Carlos Garcia Campos]

(In reply to Alex Christensen from comment #6)
> Switching all clients to UniqueRef would be nice.

Then I'll keep this simple and switch all clients in a follow up.

[Carlos Garcia Campos]

Committed r218107: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/218107>