Web Inspector: Basic Block Annotations and Type Profiler annotations wrong for script with "class" with default constructor

• Component: Web Inspector
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Joseph Pecoraro]

* SUMMARY
Basic Block Annotations and Type Profiler annotations wrong for script with "class".

* TEST (bad-script.js)
var a;
var b = 1;
var c = 1;
class Foo {};

* STEPS TO REPRODUCE
1. Turn on the Type Profiler / Code Coverage
2. Run the above script
  => mis-highlighted regions and types

[Joseph Pecoraro]

Created attachment 261369 [details]
[IMAGE] Issue

[Saam Barati]

This seems like a bug in JSC. I'll take it

[Saam Barati]

I think the problem here has to do with default constructors.

[Radar WebKit Bug Importer]

<rdar://problem/22785402>

[Saam Barati]

(In reply to comment #3)
> I think the problem here has to do with default constructors.

It does. And their bogus "text ranges" that we interpret as being part of the user program's source code. It's obviously not. 
We parse these default constructors from C++ Strings we create.

[Saam Barati]

Created attachment 261679 [details]
patch

This is one possible solution.
Another solution is to set a bit on
UnlinkedFunctionExecutable indicating it's a default
constructor (or we can generalize the bit to mean that
this thing was created outside the user's source code).
And, if that bit is set, we will not insert the function
as an unexecuted range.

[Mark Lam]

Comment on attachment 261679 [details]
patch

r=me

[WebKit Commit Bot]

Comment on attachment 261679 [details]
patch

Clearing flags on attachment: 261679

Committed r190086: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/190086>

[WebKit Commit Bot]

All reviewed patches have been landed.  Closing bug.

[WebKit Commit Bot]

Re-opened since this is blocked by bug 149427

[Saam Barati]

landed in:
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/190108