Bug 146113
| Summary: | Implement conic gradients from CSS Image Values Level 4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Lea Verou <lea> |
| Component: | CSS | Assignee: | Nobody <webkit-unassigned> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | Normal | CC: | andy, bfulgham, dbates, dino, gilmoreorless, gonzalec, jond, jonlee, jpalten, laura.carvajal, mail, marsjaninzmarsa, rsukochev, sam, sayasree, simon.fraser, tru.vinci, webkit-bug-importer |
| Priority: | P2 | Keywords: | InRadar |
| Version: | 528+ (Nightly build) | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| URL: | http://www.w3.org/TR/css4-images/#conic-gradients | ||
| Bug Depends on: | 178987 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
Lea Verou
Conic gradients [1] are useful for a number of effects on the Web that cannot be emulated in any other way (see [2]). They can be implemented in Cairo via mesh gradients. Please implement them.
[1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/css4-images/#conic-gradients
[2]: http://leaverou.github.io/conic-gradient
| Attachments | ||
|---|---|---|
| Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc. |
Sreenivasulu S
Conic gradients are quite powerful in creating cool looking effects.
Definitely, it is a useful in the toolkit of a web developer.
This is needed to be implemented in all all the browsers: Chrome, Opera, Firefox, IE, Safari.
César González
Yes, it is a useful feature, and if the algorithm to implement would be fast, can be used into web animations. Current solutions are tricky and slow to be animated.
vinci
+1
Roman
+1
Roman
+1
Jelle Alten
This would be a very useful feature. It is even pretty odd that it is not there yet.
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
<rdar://problem/25760786>
Jon Lee
rdar://problem/21444701
Sam Weinig
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 189329 ***
Lea Verou
The (In reply to Sam Weinig from comment #9)
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 189329 ***
How is it a duplicate of bug 189329 when it precedes it by over 3 YEARS?!
Sam Weinig
(In reply to Lea Verou from comment #10)
> The (In reply to Sam Weinig from comment #9)
> >
> > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 189329 ***
>
> How is it a duplicate of bug 189329 when it precedes it by over 3 YEARS?!
I'm sorry Lea. If I had caught / remembered that you had already filed a bug earlier, I totally would have had Megan do the work in this one. But since I didn't catch / remember until she was in the process of landing her patch, I chose, in the interest of keeping things moving, to dupe toward where the work was happening.