| Summary: | [New Block-Inside-Inline Model] Implement the correct painting order for blocks inside inlines | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Dave Hyatt <hyatt> | ||||||
| Component: | Layout and Rendering | Assignee: | Dave Hyatt <hyatt> | ||||||
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||||||||
| Severity: | Normal | CC: | commit-queue | ||||||
| Priority: | P2 | ||||||||
| Version: | 528+ (Nightly build) | ||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
Dave Hyatt
2015-04-01 15:02:48 PDT
Created attachment 249944 [details]
Patch (just for ews)
Attachment 249944 [details] did not pass style-queue:
ERROR: Source/WebCore/rendering/InlineFlowBox.cpp:1135: Weird number of spaces at line-start. Are you using a 4-space indent? [whitespace/indent] [3]
Total errors found: 1 in 14 files
If any of these errors are false positives, please file a bug against check-webkit-style.
Created attachment 249984 [details]
Patch
Comment on attachment 249984 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=249984&action=review Is this enough testing to cover all the code? > Source/WebCore/rendering/EllipsisBox.cpp:143 > +bool EllipsisBox::nodeAtPoint(const HitTestRequest& request, HitTestResult& result, const HitTestLocation& locationInContainer, const LayoutPoint& accumulatedOffset, LayoutUnit lineTop, LayoutUnit lineBottom, HitTestAction hitTestAction) Argument list here is getting out of hand. Can we further merge some of these intro structs and classes? > Source/WebCore/rendering/InlineElementBox.cpp:74 > + PaintPhase newPhase = (paintInfo.phase == PaintPhaseChildOutlines) ? PaintPhaseOutline : paintInfo.phase; > + newPhase = (newPhase == PaintPhaseChildBlockBackgrounds) ? PaintPhaseChildBlockBackground : newPhase; This seems like a strange way to write it. How about a switch? PaintInfo subtreePaintInfo = paintInfo; switch (subtreePaintInfo.phase) { case PaintPhaseChildOutlines: subtreePaintInfo.phase = PaintPhaseOutline; break; case PaintPhaseChildBlockBackgrounds: subtreePaintInfo.phase = PaintPhaseChildBlockBackground; break; default: break; } Or if you want it to look more compact, you can use this kind of formatting (and we can change the coding style guidelines to allow it). switch (subtreePaintInfo.phase) { case PaintPhaseChildOutlines: subtreePaintInfo.phase = PaintPhaseOutline; break; case PaintPhaseChildBlockBackgrounds: subtreePaintInfo.phase = PaintPhaseChildBlockBackground; break; default: break; } The ? : seem harder to read. |