Summary: | Value assignment operator of Optional should be stricter | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Antti Koivisto <koivisto> | ||||
Component: | Web Template Framework | Assignee: | Nobody <webkit-unassigned> | ||||
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||||||
Severity: | Normal | CC: | andersca, benjamin, cmarcelo, commit-queue, mmaxfield | ||||
Priority: | P2 | ||||||
Version: | 528+ (Nightly build) | ||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Antti Koivisto
2015-04-01 05:21:56 PDT
Created attachment 249914 [details]
patch
Comment on attachment 249914 [details]
patch
OK
Where's your test!?!?!?! I don't think something like this requires a test. There are no functional changes. Code like http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/182271 just doesn't compile without this. Note that Optional is simply our version of std::optional which is likely to be in C++17. |