Summary: | js/dom/Promise.html is flaky | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Alexey Proskuryakov <ap> |
Component: | Tools / Tests | Assignee: | Nobody <webkit-unassigned> |
Status: | NEW --- | ||
Severity: | Normal | CC: | ggaren, ryanhaddad, sam |
Priority: | P2 | ||
Version: | 528+ (Nightly build) | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160857 | ||
Bug Depends on: | 147933 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Alexey Proskuryakov
2015-01-02 10:20:28 PST
Marked as flaky in <http://trac.webkit.org/r177865>. Are promise and setTimeout timers on different event queues? function promiseAsync() { var global = "foo"; var f = new Promise(function(r1, r2) { is(global, "foo", "Global should be foo"); r1(42); is(global, "foo", "Global should still be foo"); setTimeout(function() { is(global, "bar", "Global should still be bar!"); runTest(); }, 0); }).then(function() { global = "bar"; }); is(global, "foo", "Global should still be foo (2)"); } (In reply to comment #2) > Are promise and setTimeout timers on different event queues? They are...kind of. (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Are promise and setTimeout timers on different event queues? > > They are...kind of. I don't think anything in our implementation ensures this ordering, but it really should. This is a great example of why it would be great if we have a unified event loop mechanism. In this case, the bug is that the .then() should run at the next microtask checkpoint, which is defined as being before the next chance for a timer to fire. Our implementation of Promises does not use the microtask checkpoint, but rather uses ScriptExecutionContext::postTask() mechanism, which is not quite the same thing. The test is also flaky on release, so I removed the debug flag in http://trac.webkit.org/projects/webkit/changeset/210898 https://webkit-test-results.webkit.org/dashboards/flakiness_dashboard.html#showAllRuns=true&tests=js%2Fdom%2FPromise.html |