Summary: | WebGL EXT_frag_depth may now be implemented | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Florian Bösch <pyalot> | ||||
Component: | WebGL | Assignee: | Nobody <webkit-unassigned> | ||||
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||||||
Severity: | Normal | CC: | dino, jonlee, pyalot, roger_fong | ||||
Priority: | P2 | ||||||
Version: | 528+ (Nightly build) | ||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
URL: | http://www.khronos.org/registry/webgl/extensions/EXT_frag_depth/ | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Florian Bösch
2014-06-08 22:42:39 PDT
EXT_frag_depth changed registry status to community approved. Firefox now implements EXT_frag_depth unprefixed on OSX and Linux and Windows. The EXT_frag_depth extension was moved from draft to community approved. Created attachment 243080 [details]
patch
I don't think those sRGB entries in the xcodeproj file were meant to be there in the first place. Xcode has gotten rid of them for me. Comment on attachment 243080 [details] patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=243080&action=review > Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:10 > + webgl/1.0.3/conformance/extensions/ext-frag-depth.html This test is currently skipped. We should make a copy in fast/canvas/webgl (assuming all the referenced JS files are compatible) > Source/WebCore/WebCore.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj:-23497 > - 72E417651A2E8D50004C562A /* JSEXTsRGB.h in Headers */, I assume this is what you were talking about? (In reply to comment #7) > Comment on attachment 243080 [details] > patch > > View in context: > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=243080&action=review > > > Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:10 > > + webgl/1.0.3/conformance/extensions/ext-frag-depth.html > Will do. > This test is currently skipped. We should make a copy in fast/canvas/webgl > (assuming all the referenced JS files are compatible) > > > Source/WebCore/WebCore.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj:-23497 > > - 72E417651A2E8D50004C562A /* JSEXTsRGB.h in Headers */, > > I assume this is what you were talking about? Yup |