Bug 132534 – [Extended Background] Respect repeat-x/repeat-y when creating margin tiles

• Component: New Bugs
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Sam Weinig]

[Extended Background] Respect repeat-x/repeat-y when creating margin tiles

[Sam Weinig]

Created attachment 230767 [details]
Patch

[Simon Fraser (smfr)]

Comment on attachment 230767 [details]
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=230767&action=review

> Source/WebCore/page/FrameView.cpp:2547
> +    unsigned mode = 0;

Can't this be a type?

> Source/WebCore/page/FrameView.cpp:2561
> +    if (documentElementRenderer && documentElementRenderer->style().hasBackgroundImage()) {
> +        if (documentElementRenderer->style().backgroundRepeatX() == RepeatFill)
> +            mode |= ExtendedBackgroundModeHorizontal;
> +        if (documentElementRenderer->style().backgroundRepeatY() == RepeatFill)
> +            mode |= ExtendedBackgroundModeVertical;
> +    }
> +    
> +    if (bodyRenderer && bodyRenderer->style().hasBackgroundImage()) {
> +        if (bodyRenderer->style().backgroundRepeatX() == RepeatFill)
> +            mode |= ExtendedBackgroundModeHorizontal;
> +        if (bodyRenderer->style().backgroundRepeatY() == RepeatFill)
> +            mode |= ExtendedBackgroundModeVertical;
> +    }

I think you only want to look at the one that supplies the root background. We have (poorly factored) code elsewhere that does this.

> Source/WebCore/page/FrameView.cpp:2592
> +    renderView->compositor().setRootExtendedBackgroundColor(mode == ExtendedBackgroundModeAll ? Color() : documentBackgroundColor());

Any reason not to always set the color? What happens if the background image has alpha?

> Source/WebCore/page/FrameView.cpp:2595
> +    

Boop.

> Source/WebCore/page/FrameView.cpp:2614
> +    

Stupid xcode.

> Source/WebCore/page/FrameView.h:203
> +    };
> +    

Typedef for the bitmask please.

> Source/WebCore/page/FrameView.h:210
> +    

r-

[Beth Dakin]

Comment on attachment 230767 [details]
Patch

This is a good approach. r=me, but you should address Simon's comments.

[Sam Weinig]

Committed revision 168362.