Summary: | [GTK][CMake] Look for glx.h in OPENGL_INCLUDE_DIR. | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Raphael Kubo da Costa (:rakuco) <rakuco> | ||||||
Component: | New Bugs | Assignee: | Raphael Kubo da Costa (:rakuco) <rakuco> | ||||||
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||||||||
Severity: | Normal | CC: | bunhere, commit-queue, gyuyoung.kim, mrobinson, sergio, zan | ||||||
Priority: | P2 | ||||||||
Version: | 528+ (Nightly build) | ||||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Raphael Kubo da Costa (:rakuco)
2014-04-02 01:22:37 PDT
Created attachment 228372 [details]
Patch
Comment on attachment 228372 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=228372&action=review > Source/cmake/OptionsGTK.cmake:231 > +set(_required_includes_old ${CMAKE_REQUIRED_INCLUDES}) Why do you use the macro naming scheme here? I think this can be old_required_includes or OLD_REQUIRED_INCLUDES. Comment on attachment 228372 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=228372&action=review >> Source/cmake/OptionsGTK.cmake:231 >> +set(_required_includes_old ${CMAKE_REQUIRED_INCLUDES}) > > Why do you use the macro naming scheme here? I think this can be old_required_includes or OLD_REQUIRED_INCLUDES. No particular reason, I just thought it would make sense to make the name look internal. I can change it to OLD_REQUIRED_INCLUDES before landing. Thanks for fixing! Created attachment 228479 [details]
Patch for landing
Committed r166702: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/166702> |