Bug 128156

Summary: [EFL][WK2] Stop using COMPILE_ASSERT_MATCHING_ENUM macros in EFL WebKit2
Product: WebKit Reporter: Jinwoo Song <jinwoo7.song>
Component: WebKit EFLAssignee: Jinwoo Song <jinwoo7.song>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: Normal CC: bunhere, cdumez, commit-queue, gyuyoung.kim, lucas.de.marchi, ryuan.choi
Priority: P2    
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch
none
Patch none

Jinwoo Song
Reported 2014-02-03 20:30:39 PST
SSIA.
Attachments
Patch (23.50 KB, patch)
2014-02-03 20:33 PST, Jinwoo Song
no flags
Patch (23.14 KB, patch)
2014-02-03 23:31 PST, Jinwoo Song
no flags
Jinwoo Song
Comment 1 2014-02-03 20:33:00 PST
Ryuan Choi
Comment 2 2014-02-03 20:46:56 PST
Comment on attachment 223067 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=223067&action=review Thanks. I commented bit. > Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/efl/ewk_navigation_policy_decision_private.h:69 > + Ewk_Navigation_Type toEwkNavigationType(WKFrameNavigationType navigationType) const; > + Event_Mouse_Button toEventMouseButton(WKEventMouseButton mouseButton) const; > + Event_Modifier_Keys toEventModifierKeys(WKEventModifiers modifiers) const; I am not sure why we should add these as methods? Can we make them as static inline function? At least, they can be static methods. > Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/efl/ewk_private.h:29 > #include <wtf/Assertions.h> Does we need to keep this? > Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/efl/ewk_view.cpp:399 > +inline WKFindOptions toWKFindOptions(Ewk_Find_Options options) > +{ > + unsigned wkFindOptions = 0; > + > + if (options & EWK_FIND_OPTIONS_CASE_INSENSITIVE) > + wkFindOptions |= kWKFindOptionsCaseInsensitive; > + if (options & EWK_FIND_OPTIONS_AT_WORD_STARTS) > + wkFindOptions |= kWKFindOptionsAtWordStarts; > + if (options & EWK_FIND_OPTIONS_TREAT_MEDIAL_CAPITAL_AS_WORD_START) > + wkFindOptions |= kWKFindOptionsTreatMedialCapitalAsWordStart; > + if (options & EWK_FIND_OPTIONS_BACKWARDS) > + wkFindOptions |= kWKFindOptionsBackwards; > + if (options & EWK_FIND_OPTIONS_WRAP_AROUND) > + wkFindOptions |= kWKFindOptionsWrapAround; > + if (options & EWK_FIND_OPTIONS_SHOW_OVERLAY) > + wkFindOptions |= kWKFindOptionsShowOverlay; > + if (options & EWK_FIND_OPTIONS_SHOW_FIND_INDICATOR) > + wkFindOptions |= kWKFindOptionsShowFindIndicator; > + if (options & EWK_FIND_OPTIONS_SHOW_HIGHLIGHT) > + wkFindOptions |= kWKFindOptionsShowHighlight; > + > + return static_cast<WKFindOptions>(wkFindOptions); > +} I didn't check whether it is correct. but it looks changed the logic, right? > Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/efl/ewk_view.cpp:529 > + switch (mode) { > + case EWK_PAGINATION_MODE_INVALID: > + break; Should we keep EWK_PAGINATION_MODE_INVALID if it is not in kWK's?
Ryuan Choi
Comment 3 2014-02-03 20:51:52 PST
Comment on attachment 223067 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=223067&action=review > Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/efl/ewk_context.cpp:215 > + return kWKCacheModelPrimaryWebBrowser; > + } > + ASSERT_NOT_REACHED(); > + > + return kWKCacheModelDocumentViewer; > +} I don't know whether we have rules. But, you did it as two ways in a patch. any reason? > Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/efl/ewk_popup_menu_item.cpp:47 > + default: > + ASSERT_NOT_REACHED(); > + return EWK_POPUP_MENU_ITEM; > + } here
Anders Carlsson
Comment 4 2014-02-03 22:20:35 PST
Comment on attachment 223067 [details] Patch Patch looks good. Feel free to land as is, or address Ryan's comments.
Jinwoo Song
Comment 5 2014-02-03 23:24:37 PST
Comment on attachment 223067 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=223067&action=review >> Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/efl/ewk_context.cpp:215 >> +} > > I don't know whether we have rules. > > But, you did it as two ways in a patch. any reason? As there is no concrete rules as I know, I added functions when there are more than three or four enum values. >> Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/efl/ewk_navigation_policy_decision_private.h:69 >> + Event_Modifier_Keys toEventModifierKeys(WKEventModifiers modifiers) const; > > I am not sure why we should add these as methods? > > Can we make them as static inline function? > > At least, they can be static methods. Exactly. I'll fix it. >> Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/efl/ewk_popup_menu_item.cpp:47 >> + } > > here I'll fix it. >> Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/efl/ewk_private.h:29 >> #include <wtf/Assertions.h> > > Does we need to keep this? No, I'll remove this line. >> Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/efl/ewk_view.cpp:399 >> +} > > I didn't check whether it is correct. but it looks changed the logic, right? As several find options may be mixed, we have to do '|' operation. In previous code, static_cast converts the Ewk_Find_Options to WKFindOptions and in WKSahredAPICast, find options are mixed similarly like this. >> Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/efl/ewk_view.cpp:529 >> + break; > > Should we keep EWK_PAGINATION_MODE_INVALID if it is not in kWK's? Because of [-Werror=switch] error, we have to keep this value in switch.
Jinwoo Song
Comment 6 2014-02-03 23:25:42 PST
(In reply to comment #4) > (From update of attachment 223067 [details]) > Patch looks good. Feel free to land as is, or address Ryan's comments. Thanks for review, Andersca! I'll land a patch with Ryuan's comment.
Jinwoo Song
Comment 7 2014-02-03 23:31:10 PST
Created attachment 223075 [details] Patch Patch for landing after applying Ryuan's comments.
Ryuan Choi
Comment 8 2014-02-03 23:35:51 PST
(In reply to comment #7) > Created an attachment (id=223075) [details] > Patch > > Patch for landing after applying Ryuan's comments. Looks fine to me. :)
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 9 2014-02-04 00:15:27 PST
Comment on attachment 223075 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 223075 Committed r163367: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/163367>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 10 2014-02-04 00:15:30 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.