Summary: | AX: Crash in WebKit::WebPageProxy::registerWebProcessAccessibilityToken | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | chris fleizach <cfleizach> | ||||
Component: | Accessibility | Assignee: | chris fleizach <cfleizach> | ||||
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||||||
Severity: | Normal | CC: | commit-queue, webkit-bug-importer | ||||
Priority: | P2 | Keywords: | InRadar | ||||
Version: | 528+ (Nightly build) | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | All | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
chris fleizach
2014-01-21 17:55:10 PST
Created attachment 221815 [details]
patch
Comment on attachment 221815 [details] patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=221815&action=review > Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/mac/WebPageProxyMac.mm:390 > + if (!isValid()) > + return; Is it semantically correct to ignore this call, or should the data be queued and sent once the process is (re)started? (In reply to comment #2) > (From update of attachment 221815 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=221815&action=review > > > Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/mac/WebPageProxyMac.mm:390 > > + if (!isValid()) > > + return; > > Is it semantically correct to ignore this call, or should the data be queued and sent once the process is (re)started? Good question. I should play with this some more Comment on attachment 221815 [details] patch Clearing flags on attachment: 221815 Committed r164887: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/164887> All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug. |