Bug 108625 – Scrollbars misplaced with accelerated compositing for overflow scroll

• Component: Layout and Rendering
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Allan Sandfeld Jensen]

If the setting AcceleratedCompositingForOverflowScroll is enabled, the scrolling content is automatically given its own layer, but the scrollbars are rendered on the content layer instead of on their own layer. This means the scrollbars can be scrolled out of the visible view. Chromium has a platform ifdef to fix that, but it should be fixed generally.

[Allan Sandfeld Jensen]

Created attachment 186026 [details]
Patch

[Build Bot]

Comment on attachment 186026 [details]
Patch

Attachment 186026 [details] did not pass mac-ews (mac):
Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/16299689

New failing tests:
compositing/overflow/composited-scrolling-creates-a-stacking-container.html

[Build Bot]

Comment on attachment 186026 [details]
Patch

Attachment 186026 [details] did not pass mac-wk2-ews (mac-wk2):
Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/16298683

New failing tests:
compositing/overflow/composited-scrolling-creates-a-stacking-container.html

[Allan Sandfeld Jensen]

Created attachment 186052 [details]
Patch

Update the result for the one test overriding accelerated compositing for overflow scroll on all ports.

[WebKit Review Bot]

Comment on attachment 186052 [details]
Patch

Attachment 186052 [details] did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb):
Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/16334419

New failing tests:
fast/forms/datalist/update-range-with-datalist.html
compositing/scrollbar-painting.html
fast/layers/no-clipping-overflow-hidden-hardware-acceleration.html
fast/layers/no-clipping-overflow-hidden-added-after-transform.html
compositing/geometry/limit-layer-bounds-transformed-overflow.html
compositing/overflow/content-gains-scrollbars.html
fast/loader/javascript-url-in-object.html
compositing/overflow/overflow-scrollbar-layers.html
fast/loader/text-document-wrapping.html
compositing/iframes/resizer.html
fast/layers/no-clipping-overflow-hidden-added-after-transition.html
compositing/overflow/resize-painting.html
compositing/overflow/clip-content-under-overflow-controls.html
compositing/overflow/repaint-after-losing-scrollbars.html
compositing/layer-creation/overflow-scroll-overlap.html

[Allan Sandfeld Jensen]

(In reply to comment #5)
> (From update of attachment 186052 [details])
> Attachment 186052 [details] did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb):
> Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/16334419
> 
> New failing tests:
> fast/forms/datalist/update-range-with-datalist.html
> compositing/scrollbar-painting.html
> fast/layers/no-clipping-overflow-hidden-hardware-acceleration.html
> fast/layers/no-clipping-overflow-hidden-added-after-transform.html
> compositing/geometry/limit-layer-bounds-transformed-overflow.html
> compositing/overflow/content-gains-scrollbars.html
> fast/loader/javascript-url-in-object.html
> compositing/overflow/overflow-scrollbar-layers.html
> fast/loader/text-document-wrapping.html
> compositing/iframes/resizer.html
> fast/layers/no-clipping-overflow-hidden-added-after-transition.html
> compositing/overflow/resize-painting.html
> compositing/overflow/clip-content-under-overflow-controls.html
> compositing/overflow/repaint-after-losing-scrollbars.html
> compositing/layer-creation/overflow-scroll-overlap.html

I am tempted to preserving the chromium quirk for now, so chromium always have layers for the scrollbars, accelerated overflow scroll or not. Though I suspect fixing it would reduce the baseline differences.

[Allan Sandfeld Jensen]

Created attachment 186607 [details]
Patch

Let Chromium stay unchanged so their baselines still match.

[James Robinson]

(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > (From update of attachment 186052 [details] [details])
> > Attachment 186052 [details] [details] did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb):
> > Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/16334419
> > 
> > New failing tests:
> > fast/forms/datalist/update-range-with-datalist.html
> > compositing/scrollbar-painting.html
> > fast/layers/no-clipping-overflow-hidden-hardware-acceleration.html
> > fast/layers/no-clipping-overflow-hidden-added-after-transform.html
> > compositing/geometry/limit-layer-bounds-transformed-overflow.html
> > compositing/overflow/content-gains-scrollbars.html
> > fast/loader/javascript-url-in-object.html
> > compositing/overflow/overflow-scrollbar-layers.html
> > fast/loader/text-document-wrapping.html
> > compositing/iframes/resizer.html
> > fast/layers/no-clipping-overflow-hidden-added-after-transition.html
> > compositing/overflow/resize-painting.html
> > compositing/overflow/clip-content-under-overflow-controls.html
> > compositing/overflow/repaint-after-losing-scrollbars.html
> > compositing/layer-creation/overflow-scroll-overlap.html
> 
> I am tempted to preserving the chromium quirk for now, so chromium always have layers for the scrollbars, accelerated overflow scroll or not. Though I suspect fixing it would reduce the baseline differences.

It's not really a "quirk" so much as an intentional performance tradeoff.

[Allan Sandfeld Jensen]

(In reply to comment #8)
> 
> It's not really a "quirk" so much as an intentional performance tradeoff.

The quirk is that it is always enabled rather than only when accelerated compositing of overflow scroll is enabled. You probably always have it enabled in Chrome, but in the test framework it can be disabled which leads to different results.

[James Robinson]

(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > 
> > It's not really a "quirk" so much as an intentional performance tradeoff.
> 
> The quirk is that it is always enabled

Which is the behavior we want.

> rather than only when accelerated compositing of overflow scroll is enabled.

That would not be the behavior we want.

> You probably always have it enabled in Chrome, but in the test framework it can be disabled which leads to different results.

[Allan Sandfeld Jensen]

Simon, can I assume your review still applies to the updated patch? Chromium definitely prefers to stay unchanged.

[WebKit Review Bot]

Comment on attachment 186607 [details]
Patch

Clearing flags on attachment: 186607

Committed r142140: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/142140>

[WebKit Review Bot]

All reviewed patches have been landed.  Closing bug.