<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.webkit.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4.1"
          urlbase="https://bugs.webkit.org/"
          
          maintainer="admin@webkit.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>97791</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2012-09-27 08:46:32 -0700</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>fast/profiler/apply.html fails with LLInt on 32 bit</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2016-06-06 20:00:44 -0700</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebKit</product>
          <component>JavaScriptCore</component>
          <version>528+ (Nightly build)</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>INVALID</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>Qt, QtTriaged</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>Normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          <blocked>79666</blocked>
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Csaba Osztrogonác">ossy</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Nobody">webkit-unassigned</assigned_to>
          <cc>fpizlo</cc>
    
    <cc>gaborb</cc>
    
    <cc>hausmann</cc>
    
    <cc>joepeck</cc>
    
    <cc>kadam</cc>
    
    <cc>laszlo.gombos</cc>
    
    <cc>loki</cc>
    
    <cc>mark.lam</cc>
    
    <cc>ossy</cc>
    
    <cc>zherczeg</cc>
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>729562</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Csaba Osztrogonác">ossy</who>
    <bug_when>2012-09-27 08:46:32 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>We enabled LLInt on Qt - https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/129760, but 
fast/profiler/apply.html started to fail on 32 bit (release/debug too)

--- /home/webkitbuildbot/slaves/release32bit-NRWT/buildslave/qt-linux-32-release-NRWT/build/layout-test-results/fast/profiler/apply-expected.txt 
+++ /home/webkitbuildbot/slaves/release32bit-NRWT/buildslave/qt-linux-32-release-NRWT/build/layout-test-results/fast/profiler/apply-actual.txt 
@@ -6,7 +6,8 @@
 Thread_1 (no file) (line 0)
    startTest apply.html (line 11)
       fakeObject apply.html (line 18)
-         fakeInteriorFunction apply.html (line 24)
+         apply (no file) (line 0)
+            fakeInteriorFunction apply.html (line 24)
       endTest profiler-test-JS-resources.js (line 1)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>729566</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Csaba Osztrogonác">ossy</who>
    <bug_when>2012-09-27 08:54:36 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>I skipped it by https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/129768, 
please unskip it with the proper fix.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>733017</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Mark Lam">mark.lam</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-02 13:33:01 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>I&apos;ve confirmed that this issue reproduces on the 32-bit ASM llint as well but not the 64-bit ASM llint.  It looks to be a regression in the 32-bit llint code.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>733020</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Mark Lam">mark.lam</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-02 13:34:13 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #2)
&gt; I&apos;ve confirmed that this issue reproduces on the 32-bit ASM llint as well but not the 64-bit ASM llint.  It looks to be a regression in the 32-bit llint code.

To clarify, I reproduced this on a mac.  This is not a Qt specific issue.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>734713</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Ádám Kallai">kadam</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-04 08:29:18 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>I found another test. This test fails on Qt 32 bit. (release/debug too) 
I&apos;m going to skip this test on Qt.

 * http/tests/w3c/webperf/approved/navigation-timing/html/test_timing_xserver_redirect.html

--- /ramdisk/qt-linux-32-release-webkit2/build/layout-test-results/http/tests/w3c/webperf/approved/navigation-timing/html/test_timing_xserver_redirect-expected.txt 
+++ /ramdisk/qt-linux-32-release-webkit2/build/layout-test-results/http/tests/w3c/webperf/approved/navigation-timing/html/test_timing_xserver_redirect-actual.txt 
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 FAIL Starting document.location.hostname is correct (127.0.0.1:8000) assert_equals: Starting document.location.hostname is correct (127.0.0.1:8000) expected &quot;127.0.0.1:8000&quot; but got &quot;127.0.0.1&quot;(stack: assert@http://127.0.0.1:8000/w3c/resources/testharness.js:1646
 assert_equals@http://127.0.0.1:8000/w3c/resources/testharness.js:567
 http://127.0.0.1:8000/w3c/webperf/resources/webperftestharness.js:145
+apply@[native code]
 step@http://127.0.0.1:8000/w3c/resources/testharness.js:876
 test@http://127.0.0.1:8000/w3c/resources/testharness.js:338
 wp_test@http://127.0.0.1:8000/w3c/webperf/resources/webperftestharness.js:67</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>734726</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Ádám Kallai">kadam</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-04 08:48:41 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>I skipped it: Committed r130394: &lt;http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/130394&gt;
Please unskip it with the proper fix.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>758663</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Csaba Osztrogonác">ossy</who>
    <bug_when>2012-11-05 10:25:06 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>The bug is still valid.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>772819</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Csaba Osztrogonác">ossy</who>
    <bug_when>2012-11-21 05:08:21 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>still valid bug ... Is there any plan to fix this LLINT bug?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>772829</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Filip Pizlo">fpizlo</who>
    <bug_when>2012-11-21 05:27:39 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #7)
&gt; still valid bug ... Is there any plan to fix this LLINT bug?

I should hope so!</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1199861</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="Joseph Pecoraro">joepeck</who>
    <bug_when>2016-06-06 20:00:44 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Legacy Profiler has been removed. This test no longer exists.

Given how old this bug is, I&apos;m going to close. It sounds like back in 2012 someone was able to reproduce on Mac, but if this was a serious LLInt issue it would have been addressed.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>