97692 2012-09-26 09:33:18 -0700 Inner timestamps should be ignore without CSS 2012-09-27 18:41:11 -0700 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit Media 525.x (Safari 3.2) All All NEW P2 Normal --- 43668 1 vcarbune vcarbune eric.carlson silviapf oldest_to_newest 728669 0 vcarbune 2012-09-26 09:33:18 -0700 As per the current WebVTT specification, changes to the displayed text should only apply when the CSS :past and :future pseudo-classes are used. Otherwise, the text displayed should be the same as without timestamps. 729473 1 silviapf 2012-09-27 06:24:36 -0700 Have we implemented it differently? Maybe what we have makes more sense and we should see that WebVTT is changed? 729524 2 vcarbune 2012-09-27 07:53:14 -0700 (In reply to comment #1) > Have we implemented it differently? Maybe what we have makes more sense and we should see that WebVTT is changed? Yes, it's different in the sense that we hide by default the future nodes, while the spec doesn't. The spec certainly needs some changes and maybe we should file a spec bug for implicitly hiding future nodes (I don't see any why an author would specify timestamps and not want the future nodes to be hidden). I've been pointing out some of the changes required here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-texttracks/2012Sep/0069.html 730101 3 silviapf 2012-09-27 18:41:11 -0700 I suggest registering a bug on the spec and not making any changes here, since I agree that our behaviour makes a lot more sense.