92755 2012-07-31 07:50:07 -0700 CORS handling of 401 response to preflight incorrect (sends the actual POST anyway) 2018-12-08 08:09:45 -0800 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit Page Loading 528+ (Nightly build) Unspecified Unspecified NEW https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778548 P2 Normal --- 1 bzbarsky webkit-unassigned abarth ap rbuis youennf oldest_to_newest 683055 0 bzbarsky 2012-07-31 07:50:07 -0700 Apparently if a preflight for an XHR POST returns a 401 (due to the site requiring Authorization headers), WebKit will send the main POST anyway, in violation of the spec. Per spec, non-200 responses to a preflight mean the whole thing should be canceled. See original report at http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=139566 and see discussion in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778548 683218 1 ap 2012-07-31 09:58:50 -0700 Looking at public-webapps thread on the topic, there is a reason provided why the CORS draft specification should be changed (IIS with "Classic Application Pool" cannot be configured otherwise), but there is no explanation of why the requirement is necessary. What is the reason for the requirement to reject non-200 responses? Given that the server sends Access-Control-* response header fields, it's not clear to me why it's beneficial. 683222 2 bzbarsky 2012-07-31 10:03:18 -0700 > What is the reason for the requirement to reject non-200 responses? You could consider reading the thread in the mail archives that made the decision to do so... 683228 3 ap 2012-07-31 10:08:45 -0700 Good to know that it has been discussed. Do you have any pointers to that discussion? 683236 4 bzbarsky 2012-07-31 10:18:29 -0700 Not offhand; I'd have to search the archives, just like you... 1486308 5 rbuis 2018-12-08 08:09:45 -0800 We check that response is 200 in validatePreflightResponse and also pass access-control-preflight-request-invalid-status-400.html and access-control-preflight-request-invalid-status-501.html wpt tests, so I think this can be closed.