90896 2012-07-10 11:10:36 -0700 fast/js/dfg-cross-global-object-inline-new-array-literal.html appears to be racey 2023-12-19 23:32:19 -0800 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit DOM 528+ (Nightly build) Unspecified Unspecified RESOLVED CONFIGURATION CHANGED P2 Normal --- 1 rafaelw webkit-unassigned abarth ahmad.saleem792 annevk eric esprehn fpizlo ggaren rniwa oldest_to_newest 665892 0 rafaelw 2012-07-10 11:10:36 -0700 The test itself looks to be always "passing" but the output order of the test appears to be racey WRT iframe & parent. Added abarth, eseidel and esphren as they have recently looked into a bug that was similar. http://test-results.appspot.com/dashboards/flakiness_dashboard.html#showAllRuns=true&showExpectatioans=true&tests=fast%2Fjs%2Fdfg-cross-global-object-inline-new-array-literal.html Test expects: ---- This tests that function inlining in the DFG JIT doesn't get confused about the global object to use for array allocation. On success, you will see a series of "PASS" messages, followed by "TEST COMPLETE". PASS successfullyParsed is true TEST COMPLETE PASS done() called with 6600 ---- But sometimes gets ---- This tests that function inlining in the DFG JIT doesn't get confused about the global object to use for array allocation. On success, you will see a series of "PASS" messages, followed by "TEST COMPLETE". PASS done() called with 6600 PASS successfullyParsed is true TEST COMPLETE 665977 1 eric 2012-07-10 13:08:45 -0700 We should CC whoever added the test. :) They'll likely know more than any of us. 665979 2 eric 2012-07-10 13:09:41 -0700 http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/LayoutTests/fast/js/dfg-cross-global-object-inline-new-array-literal.html fpizlo is your man! 717594 3 esprehn 2012-09-11 15:06:59 -0700 This test doesn't actually look flaky. I see it failed one time a week ago, but I can't download the results. Looking at the test I don't see anything that looks like it would be flaky either. Can we remove this expectations change? 2000898 4 ahmad.saleem792 2023-12-19 16:25:08 -0800 This test seems to be moved from 'fast' to 'js/dom' and it does not have any platform specific expectation while using searchfox.org to check. Do we need to look into anymore? Even Comment 03 said that it does not seem to be flaky and only failed once in a whole week. If we have it as flaky or failing, we would have newer big for sure. 2000957 5 annevk 2023-12-19 23:32:19 -0800 If the file is expected to normally pass everywhere we can close this, yeah.