83400 2012-04-06 15:09:11 -0700 [chromium] Hundreds of mac failures are due to a slightly different color repaint background 2013-04-09 17:05:54 -0700 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit Tools / Tests 528+ (Nightly build) Mac Unspecified RESOLVED WONTFIX P2 Normal --- 1 ojan webkit-unassigned caryclark danakj epoger reed senorblanco oldest_to_newest 597704 0 ojan 2012-04-06 15:09:11 -0700 For example, see http://test-results.appspot.com/dashboards/flakiness_dashboard.html#showExpectations=true&tests=fast%2Ftable%2Fempty-section-crash.html. The repaint background on the platform/chromium-win and platform/chromium-linux results is #575757. On the Chromium mac bot, some pixels are #575757 and some are #565656. Not really sure how image_diff translates that to the whole background not matching. The platform/mac result has a background that is #6a6a6a, with a color profile. Diffing the chromium win/linux result with the platform/mac result only shows a diff on the text though (i.e. the backgrounds match). I assume image-diff accounts for the color-profile somehow. Also, curiously, on some of the snowleopard bots, we sometimes get a result that matches the platform/mac result: http://test-results.appspot.com/dashboards/flakiness_dashboard.html#group=%40ToT%20-%20webkit.org&showExpectations=true&tests=fast%2Ftable%2Fempty-section-crash.html 597763 1 danakj 2012-04-06 15:51:41 -0700 Probably this https://codereview.appspot.com/5758043 597765 2 danakj 2012-04-06 15:52:06 -0700 Here's the skia bug http://code.google.com/p/skia/issues/detail?id=420 598496 3 epoger 2012-04-09 12:04:22 -0700 Ojan, can you please tell me how to get a list of the "hundreds" of tests that fall into this category? (Or at least a good chunk of them?) Taking the example given, empty-section-crash, I see (via svn blame) that it was marked as expected to IMAGE fail at least 16 months ago (http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/74070/trunk/LayoutTests/platform/chromium/test_expectations.txt). Its expectations line refers to http://crbug.com/23489 , which was filed in Sept 2009... 598653 4 ojan 2012-04-09 15:02:36 -0700 (In reply to comment #3) > Ojan, can you please tell me how to get a list of the "hundreds" of tests that fall into this category? (Or at least a good chunk of them?) 1. load "webkit-patch garden-o-matic" 2. go to the expected failures tab 3. examine the fast/repaint tests Fixing the color issue probably won't make all these tests pass, but it will make it so that the pixel diffs are just text-rendering/antialiasing. So, they would be straightforward rebaselines. I think a large percentage of these have also be rebaselined. I know I rebaselined a lot of these for the Lion port before I realized that it was a more widespread problem. So, fixing this would cause a number of tests to "fail" that would need rebaselining. 872400 5 schenney 2013-04-09 17:05:54 -0700 Marked LayoutTest bugs, bugs with Chromium IDs, and some others as WontFix. Test failure bugs still are trackable via TestExpectations or disabled unit tests.