<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.webkit.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4.1"
          urlbase="https://bugs.webkit.org/"
          
          maintainer="admin@webkit.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>75681</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2012-01-05 18:45:33 -0800</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[EFL] Fixed displaying buffering progress in the media control.</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2012-08-14 03:13:30 -0700</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebKit</product>
          <component>WebKit EFL</component>
          <version>528+ (Nightly build)</version>
          <rep_platform>Other</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>Normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>0</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="KwangYong Choi">ky0.choi</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Nobody">webkit-unassigned</assigned_to>
          <cc>gyuyoung.kim</cc>
    
    <cc>gyuyoung.kim</cc>
    
    <cc>kenneth</cc>
    
    <cc>lucas.de.marchi</cc>
    
    <cc>rakuco</cc>
    
    <cc>sw0524.lee</cc>
    
    <cc>webkit.review.bot</cc>
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>530866</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="KwangYong Choi">ky0.choi</who>
    <bug_when>2012-01-05 18:45:33 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>Fixed typo. It is required &quot;rangeRect&quot; instead of &quot;rect&quot;.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>530936</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="KwangYong Choi">ky0.choi</who>
    <bug_when>2012-01-05 22:36:18 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>It is required &quot;rangeRect&quot; instead of &quot;rect&quot; to display buffering progress properly.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>675406</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
      <attachid>153722</attachid>
    <who name="KwangYong Choi">ky0.choi</who>
    <bug_when>2012-07-22 20:07:28 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 153722
patch</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>675426</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
      <attachid>153722</attachid>
    <who name="Raphael Kubo da Costa (:rakuco)">rakuco</who>
    <bug_when>2012-07-22 21:00:02 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 153722
patch

Does it make any existing test pass?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>675449</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
      <attachid>153722</attachid>
    <who name="Chris Dumez">cdumez</who>
    <bug_when>2012-07-22 22:26:41 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 153722
patch

Change looks good but it is likely that some tests need rebasing with this fix. It would be good to do the rebasing in the same patch if it is really needed.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>676615</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="KwangYong Choi">ky0.choi</who>
    <bug_when>2012-07-24 03:39:15 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>I tested &quot;LayoutTests/media/&quot; with/without this patch. But, the test results are same. Each case has 356 failures.

This patch does not affects the test results. It&apos;s about network load and displaying media control. The buffering progress can be read from JS properly, but display is wrong.

I think this patch is required to display buffering progress on media control properly.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>680427</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="KwangYong Choi">ky0.choi</who>
    <bug_when>2012-07-27 04:19:19 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Should I provide test for this patch? I think it&apos;s not easy. :(</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>680758</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
      <attachid>153722</attachid>
    <who name="Gyuyoung Kim">gyuyoung.kim</who>
    <bug_when>2012-07-27 10:06:24 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 153722
patch

Could you check if there is difference result on whole layout test. If there is no effect EFL layout test result, looks fine.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>681249</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Raphael Kubo da Costa (:rakuco)">rakuco</who>
    <bug_when>2012-07-27 17:08:09 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Are you sure no test can be unskipped after this fix?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>682771</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="KwangYong Choi">ky0.choi</who>
    <bug_when>2012-07-31 00:11:44 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>My previous test result was wrong. I should use SHARED_CORE But I did&apos;t. So I tested it again.

1. LayoutTests/media/ Test after remove efl/Skipped and wk2/Skipped

The results are same. 102 are diff and 1 is flaky.

2. Entire test

The results are little bit different. But the different items are not related to media. The changes on this patch is just display rect on media control. So it does not affect to other part.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>692422</commentid>
    <comment_count>10</comment_count>
    <who name="KwangYong Choi">ky0.choi</who>
    <bug_when>2012-08-10 03:32:26 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>There are no changes in LayoutTests. But it&apos;s too hard to make a test for this.

If this patch is not applied, then above block to calculate rangeRect is not necessary. I think it need to be merged.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>693381</commentid>
    <comment_count>11</comment_count>
      <attachid>153722</attachid>
    <who name="Gyuyoung Kim">gyuyoung.kim</who>
    <bug_when>2012-08-12 22:34:54 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 153722
patch

If this patch doesn&apos;t influence on existing layout test result and there is no unskipped tests, looks good to me.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>694738</commentid>
    <comment_count>12</comment_count>
      <attachid>153722</attachid>
    <who name="WebKit Review Bot">webkit.review.bot</who>
    <bug_when>2012-08-14 03:13:25 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 153722
patch

Clearing flags on attachment: 153722

Committed r125536: &lt;http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/125536&gt;</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>694739</commentid>
    <comment_count>13</comment_count>
    <who name="WebKit Review Bot">webkit.review.bot</who>
    <bug_when>2012-08-14 03:13:30 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>All reviewed patches have been landed.  Closing bug.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>153722</attachid>
            <date>2012-07-22 20:07:28 -0700</date>
            <delta_ts>2012-08-14 03:13:24 -0700</delta_ts>
            <desc>patch</desc>
            <filename>patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <size>1401</size>
            <attacher name="KwangYong Choi">ky0.choi</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">ZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL1NvdXJjZS9XZWJDb3JlL0NoYW5nZUxvZyBiL1NvdXJjZS9XZWJDb3JlL0No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</data>

          </attachment>
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>