74688 2011-12-15 22:51:01 -0800 REGRESSION(r103005): bidi-override-in-anonymous-block.html is failing 2011-12-27 11:53:25 -0800 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit Layout and Rendering 528+ (Nightly build) Unspecified Unspecified RESOLVED FIXED P1 Normal --- 1 morrita abarth abarth darin eric mitz rniwa oldest_to_newest 522553 0 morrita 2011-12-15 22:51:01 -0800 It's not only for Chromium. Mac ports are also breaking. I'm suspecting http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/102875, but not sure. 522579 1 morrita 2011-12-15 23:46:36 -0800 According to the Chromium Builder, http://build.webkit.org/builders/Chromium%20Linux%20Release%20%28Tests%29 It starts between r102992 and r102996. But there is no doubtful change. 522753 2 rniwa 2011-12-16 07:42:29 -0800 According to http://test-results.appspot.com/dashboards/flakiness_dashboard.html#group=%40ToT%20-%20webkit.org&tests=fast%2Fcss%2Fbidi-override-in-anonymous-block.html This is a regression from http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/103005/ Regression ranges: Chromium Win Release (Tests): http://trac.webkit.org/log/?verbose=on&rev=103009&stop_rev=103004 Chromium Linux Release (Tests): http://trac.webkit.org/log/?verbose=on&rev=103006&stop_rev=103001 SnowLeopard Intel Release (Tests): http://trac.webkit.org/log/?verbose=on&rev=103005&stop_rev=103002 And r103002-r103004 can't affect rendering like the way the test is failing. 522800 3 darin 2011-12-16 09:57:41 -0800 I’m sure Adam will want to fix this, so assigning it to him to formalize that. 526935 4 rniwa 2011-12-23 19:40:09 -0800 Any update on this regression? 527007 5 abarth 2011-12-24 11:34:10 -0800 Sorry, I didn't realize this was on my plate. I'll investigate on Tuesday. 527421 6 abarth 2011-12-27 11:13:49 -0800 *** Bug 75236 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 527426 7 abarth 2011-12-27 11:30:18 -0800 The new result is correct. This reflects the updated parsing of <rt> inside <rb> elements. I don't fully understand why the HTML5 spec changed in this regard, but from the discussion, it seems like this is the better parsing of ruby elements. 527430 8 rniwa 2011-12-27 11:33:20 -0800 (In reply to comment #7) > The new result is correct. This reflects the updated parsing of <rt> inside <rb> elements. I don't fully understand why the HTML5 spec changed in this regard, but from the discussion, it seems like this is the better parsing of ruby elements. Okay. Let's rebaseline then. 527432 9 abarth 2011-12-27 11:36:07 -0800 Committed r103719: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/103719> 527442 10 rniwa 2011-12-27 11:53:25 -0800 Committed r103721: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/103721>