<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.webkit.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4.1"
          urlbase="https://bugs.webkit.org/"
          
          maintainer="admin@webkit.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>70900</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2011-10-26 03:20:40 -0700</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[EFL] Invalidate request for the single view can be discarded without rendering.</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2011-10-27 02:29:26 -0700</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebKit</product>
          <component>WebKit EFL</component>
          <version>528+ (Nightly build)</version>
          <rep_platform>Other</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>DUPLICATE</resolution>
          <dup_id>70170</dup_id>
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>Normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>0</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="KwangHyuk">hyuki.kim</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Nobody">webkit-unassigned</assigned_to>
          <cc>eunsol47.park</cc>
    
    <cc>gyuyoung.kim</cc>
    
    <cc>lucas.de.marchi</cc>
    
    <cc>rakuco</cc>
    
    <cc>ryuan.choi</cc>
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>490715</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="KwangHyuk">hyuki.kim</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-26 03:20:40 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>As ewk_view_layout_if_needed_recursive api causes invalidate request via ChromeClient, it can be discarded without rendering as long as it would be called after ewk_view_repaints_get api.

So, It is better to be move into other position, but I couldn&apos;t make sure whether it&apos;s really good when it must be handled whenever ewk_view_layout_if_needed_recursive api is called.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>491261</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Ryuan Choi">ryuan.choi</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-26 16:29:37 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #0)
&gt; As ewk_view_layout_if_needed_recursive api causes invalidate request via ChromeClient, it can be discarded without rendering as long as it would be called after ewk_view_repaints_get api.

Wow, Good point.
It solved many rendering issues in single view.

&gt; 
&gt; So, It is better to be move into other position, but I couldn&apos;t make sure whether it&apos;s really good when it must be handled whenever ewk_view_layout_if_needed_recursive api is called.

I moved related codes to below of ewk_view_layout_if_needed_recursive.
It looks quite better.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>491278</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Lucas De Marchi">lucas.de.marchi</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-26 16:40:57 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #1)
&gt; (In reply to comment #0)
&gt; &gt; As ewk_view_layout_if_needed_recursive api causes invalidate request via ChromeClient, it can be discarded without rendering as long as it would be called after ewk_view_repaints_get api.
&gt; 
&gt; Wow, Good point.
&gt; It solved many rendering issues in single view.
&gt; 
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; So, It is better to be move into other position, but I couldn&apos;t make sure whether it&apos;s really good when it must be handled whenever ewk_view_layout_if_needed_recursive api is called.
&gt; 
&gt; I moved related codes to below of ewk_view_layout_if_needed_recursive.
&gt; It looks quite better.

There&apos;s no patch attached.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>491327</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="KwangHyuk">hyuki.kim</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-26 19:08:43 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>&gt; There&apos;s no patch attached.

Let me attach it soon. :)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>491352</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="KwangHyuk">hyuki.kim</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-26 22:25:44 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Eunsol will take care of this. :)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>491425</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Ryuan Choi">ryuan.choi</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-27 02:29:26 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>I found that changseok raised same issue and created patch.
So, I close.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 70170 ***</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>