<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.webkit.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4.1"
          urlbase="https://bugs.webkit.org/"
          
          maintainer="admin@webkit.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>70170</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2011-10-14 23:16:53 -0700</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[EFL] Some dirty areas are ignored without repainting.</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2011-11-02 00:21:48 -0700</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebKit</product>
          <component>WebKit EFL</component>
          <version>528+ (Nightly build)</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/Graphics/RequestAnimationFrame/Default.html</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>Normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          <dependson>67112</dependson>
          
          <everconfirmed>0</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="ChangSeok Oh">kevin.cs.oh</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Nobody">webkit-unassigned</assigned_to>
          <cc>gyuyoung.kim</cc>
    
    <cc>hyuki.kim</cc>
    
    <cc>leandro</cc>
    
    <cc>lucas.de.marchi</cc>
    
    <cc>rakuco</cc>
    
    <cc>ryuan.choi</cc>
    
    <cc>webkit.review.bot</cc>
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>484493</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="ChangSeok Oh">kevin.cs.oh</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-14 23:16:53 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Dirty area is not update properly while animation with requestAnimationFrame enabled for EFL port.
Visit here http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/Graphics/RequestAnimationFrame/Default.html.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>491370</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
      <attachid>112643</attachid>
    <who name="ChangSeok Oh">kevin.cs.oh</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-27 00:12:19 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 112643
Proposed patch</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>491426</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Ryuan Choi">ryuan.choi</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-27 02:29:26 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 70900 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>491428</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Ryuan Choi">ryuan.choi</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-27 02:31:06 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Informal r+ on my side.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>491494</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Raphael Kubo da Costa (:rakuco)">rakuco</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-27 06:04:49 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Passing &quot;-b single http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/Graphics/RequestAnimationFrame/Default.html&quot; to EWebLauncher did not show anything weird while rendering the linked page. Can you describe what was supposed to be seen?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>491541</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="ChangSeok Oh">kevin.cs.oh</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-27 07:10:37 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #4)
&gt; Passing &quot;-b single http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/Graphics/RequestAnimationFrame/Default.html&quot; to EWebLauncher did not show anything weird while rendering the linked page. Can you describe what was supposed to be seen?

I guess you missed applying a submitted patch for bug67112 before. This will enable requestAnimationFrame JS API so that you can see 2 clocks and some changing numbers.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>493116</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="KwangHyuk">hyuki.kim</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-30 18:25:48 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>&gt; Passing &quot;-b single http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/Graphics/RequestAnimationFrame/Default.html&quot; to EWebLauncher did not show anything weird while rendering the linked page. Can you describe what was supposed to be seen?

Hi, Kubo,

I think that you can notice the reason why this patch is reasonable if you check www.daum.net.

Just go to www.daum.net and scroll down 2 times. and then click daum title image on top of the left cornor of website without this patch first.

And finally use this patch for the same checking.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>493117</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="KwangHyuk">hyuki.kim</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-30 18:26:07 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>LGTM.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>493269</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Raphael Kubo da Costa (:rakuco)">rakuco</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-31 06:13:34 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #5)
&gt; (In reply to comment #4)
&gt; &gt; Passing &quot;-b single http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/Graphics/RequestAnimationFrame/Default.html&quot; to EWebLauncher did not show anything weird while rendering the linked page. Can you describe what was supposed to be seen?
&gt; 
&gt; I guess you missed applying a submitted patch for bug67112 before. This will enable requestAnimationFrame JS API so that you can see 2 clocks and some changing numbers.

Oops, thanks for the pointer. From what I see, the patch makes callback counters actually work, right?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>493270</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="Raphael Kubo da Costa (:rakuco)">rakuco</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-31 06:14:16 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #8)
&gt; Oops, thanks for the pointer. From what I see, the patch makes callback counters actually work, right?

BTW, if that&apos;s the issue, doesn&apos;t it need to be fixed in the tiled backing store too?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>493275</commentid>
    <comment_count>10</comment_count>
    <who name="KwangHyuk">hyuki.kim</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-31 06:31:30 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #9)
&gt; (In reply to comment #8)
&gt; &gt; Oops, thanks for the pointer. From what I see, the patch makes callback counters actually work, right?
&gt; 
&gt; BTW, if that&apos;s the issue, doesn&apos;t it need to be fixed in the tiled backing store too?

You are right.
Tiled view also requires it.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>493280</commentid>
    <comment_count>11</comment_count>
    <who name="Raphael Kubo da Costa (:rakuco)">rakuco</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-31 06:36:27 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #10)
&gt; (In reply to comment #9)
&gt; &gt; (In reply to comment #8)
&gt; &gt; &gt; Oops, thanks for the pointer. From what I see, the patch makes callback counters actually work, right?
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; BTW, if that&apos;s the issue, doesn&apos;t it need to be fixed in the tiled backing store too?
&gt; 
&gt; You are right.
&gt; Tiled view also requires it.

OK, so if this is the issue that this patch fixes, you have my informal r+, even though it&apos;d be better to fix both backing stores in a single patch.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>494448</commentid>
    <comment_count>12</comment_count>
      <attachid>112643</attachid>
    <who name="Eric Seidel (no email)">eric</who>
    <bug_when>2011-11-01 23:12:33 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 112643
Proposed patch

rubber-stamp.  This really should be tested, but I don&apos;t think EFL has DumpREnderTree yet... Does it?  If so, we could use repaint tests.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>494465</commentid>
    <comment_count>13</comment_count>
      <attachid>112643</attachid>
    <who name="WebKit Review Bot">webkit.review.bot</who>
    <bug_when>2011-11-02 00:21:43 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 112643
Proposed patch

Clearing flags on attachment: 112643

Committed r99041: &lt;http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/99041&gt;</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>494466</commentid>
    <comment_count>14</comment_count>
    <who name="WebKit Review Bot">webkit.review.bot</who>
    <bug_when>2011-11-02 00:21:48 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>All reviewed patches have been landed.  Closing bug.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>112643</attachid>
            <date>2011-10-27 00:12:19 -0700</date>
            <delta_ts>2011-11-02 00:21:42 -0700</delta_ts>
            <desc>Proposed patch</desc>
            <filename>P70170.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <size>1706</size>
            <attacher name="ChangSeok Oh">kevin.cs.oh</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">ZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL1NvdXJjZS9XZWJLaXQvZWZsL0NoYW5nZUxvZyBiL1NvdXJjZS9XZWJLaXQv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=
</data>

          </attachment>
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>