<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.webkit.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4.1"
          urlbase="https://bugs.webkit.org/"
          
          maintainer="admin@webkit.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>66599</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2011-08-19 15:00:22 -0700</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Chromium Mac: PDF: Scrollsbars should be visible when scrolling using the two finger gesture on Lion</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2011-08-31 18:30:59 -0700</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebKit</product>
          <component>New Bugs</component>
          <version>528+ (Nightly build)</version>
          <rep_platform>Unspecified</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Unspecified</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>Normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Sailesh Agrawal">sail</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Sailesh Agrawal">sail</assigned_to>
          <cc>fishd</cc>
    
    <cc>jam</cc>
    
    <cc>webkit.review.bot</cc>
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>454120</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Sailesh Agrawal">sail</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-19 15:00:22 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Chromium Mac: PDF: Scrollsbars should be visible when scrolling using the two finger gesture on Lion</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>454124</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
      <attachid>104578</attachid>
    <who name="Sailesh Agrawal">sail</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-19 15:04:44 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 104578
Patch</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>454134</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Sailesh Agrawal">sail</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-19 15:14:39 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>This fixes the following chromium bug:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=92606</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>456241</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Sailesh Agrawal">sail</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-24 11:24:07 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Ping!</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>456585</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
      <attachid>104578</attachid>
    <who name="Nico Weber">thakis</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-24 18:13:51 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 104578
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=104578&amp;action=review

&gt; Source/WebKit/chromium/src/WebViewImpl.cpp:615
&gt; +

I&apos;m not an expert in plugins, but I would&apos;ve expected the flow to go &quot;if plugin has touch focus, send to plugin, and only send to webview if plugin didn&apos;t handle it&quot;. Sending the event to two targets looks weird to me. But again, I&apos;m probably not the right person to look at this.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>459955</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
      <attachid>104578</attachid>
    <who name="Sailesh Agrawal">sail</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-31 14:51:20 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 104578
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=104578&amp;action=review

&gt;&gt; Source/WebKit/chromium/src/WebViewImpl.cpp:615
&gt;&gt; +
&gt; 
&gt; I&apos;m not an expert in plugins, but I would&apos;ve expected the flow to go &quot;if plugin has touch focus, send to plugin, and only send to webview if plugin didn&apos;t handle it&quot;. Sending the event to two targets looks weird to me. But again, I&apos;m probably not the right person to look at this.

Unfortunately this is not possible right now. Currently ScrollableArea::handleGestureEvent() just swallows all events.

There&apos;s a TODO in EventHandler::handleGestureEvent() to add proper hit testing. I think once this is done it&apos;ll be possible to go back and do this.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>459960</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
      <attachid>104578</attachid>
    <who name="Darin Fisher (:fishd, Google)">fishd</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-31 14:57:21 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 104578
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=104578&amp;action=review

&gt;&gt;&gt; Source/WebKit/chromium/src/WebViewImpl.cpp:615
&gt;&gt;&gt; +
&gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; I&apos;m not an expert in plugins, but I would&apos;ve expected the flow to go &quot;if plugin has touch focus, send to plugin, and only send to webview if plugin didn&apos;t handle it&quot;. Sending the event to two targets looks weird to me. But again, I&apos;m probably not the right person to look at this.
&gt; 
&gt; Unfortunately this is not possible right now. Currently ScrollableArea::handleGestureEvent() just swallows all events.
&gt; 
&gt; There&apos;s a TODO in EventHandler::handleGestureEvent() to add proper hit testing. I think once this is done it&apos;ll be possible to go back and do this.

I agree with Nico.  Dispatching the event to both targets seems kind of problematic.  I also wonder why the EventHandler wouldn&apos;t just forward the event to the plugin if that is what it hits.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>459971</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
      <attachid>104578</attachid>
    <who name="Sailesh Agrawal">sail</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-31 15:06:23 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 104578
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=104578&amp;action=review

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Source/WebKit/chromium/src/WebViewImpl.cpp:615
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; +
&gt;&gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt;&gt; I&apos;m not an expert in plugins, but I would&apos;ve expected the flow to go &quot;if plugin has touch focus, send to plugin, and only send to webview if plugin didn&apos;t handle it&quot;. Sending the event to two targets looks weird to me. But again, I&apos;m probably not the right person to look at this.
&gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; Unfortunately this is not possible right now. Currently ScrollableArea::handleGestureEvent() just swallows all events.
&gt;&gt; 
&gt;&gt; There&apos;s a TODO in EventHandler::handleGestureEvent() to add proper hit testing. I think once this is done it&apos;ll be possible to go back and do this.
&gt; 
&gt; I agree with Nico.  Dispatching the event to both targets seems kind of problematic.  I also wonder why the EventHandler wouldn&apos;t just forward the event to the plugin if that is what it hits.

The EventHandler doesn&apos;t do hit testing so it can&apos;t tell if the gesture was for the plugin or not.

Safari does it the same way too so I think we can live with this for now.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>460020</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="John Abd-El-Malek">jam</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-31 16:05:54 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>btw this looks good to me</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>460051</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
      <attachid>104578</attachid>
    <who name="Darin Fisher (:fishd, Google)">fishd</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-31 16:30:39 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 104578
Patch

OK, is there a bug about cleaning this up?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>460067</commentid>
    <comment_count>10</comment_count>
    <who name="Sailesh Agrawal">sail</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-31 16:43:40 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #9)
&gt; (From update of attachment 104578 [details])
&gt; OK, is there a bug about cleaning this up?

I couldn&apos;t find one so I filed this bug:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67338</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>460141</commentid>
    <comment_count>11</comment_count>
      <attachid>104578</attachid>
    <who name="WebKit Review Bot">webkit.review.bot</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-31 18:30:55 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 104578
Patch

Clearing flags on attachment: 104578

Committed r94261: &lt;http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/94261&gt;</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>460142</commentid>
    <comment_count>12</comment_count>
    <who name="WebKit Review Bot">webkit.review.bot</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-31 18:30:59 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>All reviewed patches have been landed.  Closing bug.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>104578</attachid>
            <date>2011-08-19 15:04:44 -0700</date>
            <delta_ts>2011-08-31 18:30:55 -0700</delta_ts>
            <desc>Patch</desc>
            <filename>bug-66599-20110819150443.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <size>4280</size>
            <attacher name="Sailesh Agrawal">sail</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">U3VidmVyc2lvbiBSZXZpc2lvbjogOTMzMjgKZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL1NvdXJjZS9XZWJLaXQvY2hy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</data>

          </attachment>
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>